Are CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Stationary After All? New Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests
dc.authorscopusid | 16032093400 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 23978235900 | |
dc.authorwosid | Romero-Ávila, Diego/K-4359-2017 | |
dc.contributor.author | Romero-Avila, Diego | |
dc.contributor.author | Omay, Tolga | |
dc.contributor.other | Economics | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-05T15:17:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-05T15:17:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | Atılım University | en_US |
dc.department-temp | [Romero-Avila, Diego] Pablo de Olavide Univ, Dept Econ, Ctra Utrera,Km 1, Seville, Spain; [Omay, Tolga] Atilim Univ, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study applies a large battery of state-of-the-art nonlinear unit root tests to examine the stationarity properties of carbon dioxide emission series for 28 industrialized countries, five BRICS and seven transition economies over a very long horizon, in some cases over more than two and a half centuries. The application of time-dependent and state-dependent nonlinear unit root tests separately provides mixed evidence regarding the time-series properties of CO2 emissions and a high degree of variability across the different tests. However, the use of hybrid nonlinear unit root tests, combining the presence of structural breaks with symmetric or asymmetric ESTAR adjustment, leads to the rejection of the unit root hypothesis in each of the countries under study with at least one of the hybrid tests. This has important climate policy implications. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [ECO2017-86780-R]; Junta de Andalucia [grants number I+D+i project] [P20_00808, PAIDI SEJ-513] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [grant number ECO2017-86780-R, AEI/FEDER, UE]; and Junta de Andalucia [grants number I+D+i project P20_00808, PAIDI SEJ-513]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 2 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10666-022-09835-4 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 643 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1420-2026 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2967 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85130553155 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 621 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-022-09835-4 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1752 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000799068900001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
dc.institutionauthor | Omay, Tolga | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | CO2 emissions | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonlinearities | en_US |
dc.subject | Unit root | en_US |
dc.subject | Time dependence | en_US |
dc.subject | State dependence | en_US |
dc.subject | LSTAR process | en_US |
dc.subject | ESTAR process | en_US |
dc.subject | AESTAR process | en_US |
dc.subject | Structural breaks | en_US |
dc.title | Are CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Stationary After All? New Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | c49f4d4e-0fdb-400e-ba3c-62ec300b5c96 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c49f4d4e-0fdb-400e-ba3c-62ec300b5c96 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | f17c3770-9c6e-4de2-90e7-73c30275c2f9 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | f17c3770-9c6e-4de2-90e7-73c30275c2f9 |