The Effect of Statistically Constrained Minimum Mean Square Estimation Algorithm Which is Used For Human Head Tissue Conductivity Estimation to Source Localization

dc.authorwosidBaysal, Ugur/AAJ-5711-2020
dc.authorwosidSengul, Gokhan/G-8213-2016
dc.contributor.authorSengul, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Ugur
dc.contributor.otherComputer Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T10:56:11Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T10:56:11Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Sengul, Gokhan] Atilim Univ, Ankara, Turkey; [Baysal, Ugur] Hacettepe Univ, Elektr Elekt Muhendisligi Bolumu, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractDetermining the electrical active regions of human brain by using EEG and/or MEG data is known as "EEG/MEG bioelectromagnetic inverse problem" or "source localization". A typical source localization system intakes not only EEG/MEG data but also geometry information of subject/patient, a priori information about the electrically active sources, the number and 3-D positions of measurement electrodes and conductivities/resistivities of the tissues in the head model. In this study we investigated the conductivity estimation performance previously proposed Statistically Constrainted Minimum Mean Square Error Estimation (MiMSEE) algorithm by simulation studies and we also investigated the effect of the estimation to source localization activities. In simulation studies we used a three-layered (composed of scalp, skull and brain regions) realistic head model to estimate 100 different conductivity distributions in vivo. As a result we found that the proposed algorithm estimates the conductivity of scalp with an average error of 23%, the conductivity of skull with an average error of 40% and finally the conductivity of brain with an average error of 17%. In the second part of the study we compared the source localization errors for two cases: one, when the average conductivities of tissues given in the literature are used, and second when the subject-specific conductivity estimation is performed with MiMSEE algorithm. The results showed 10.1 mm localization error is obtained when the average conductivities given in the literature are used and 2.7 mm localization is obtained when subject-specific conductivity estimation is performed with MiMSEE algorithm. The results shows that the localization error is reduced by 73.07% when subject-specific conductivity estimation is performed with MiMSEE algorithm. We conclude that using the conductivities obtained from MiMSEE algorithm reduces the source localization error and we recommend to perform subject-specific conductivity estimation for source localization applications.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi[WOS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-388]
dc.identifier.endpage279en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-1664
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage266en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/8540
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000305266500011
dc.institutionauthorŞengül, Gökhan
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherJournal Neurological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEEGen_US
dc.subjectsource localizationen_US
dc.subjecttissue conductivitiesen_US
dc.subjectMiMSEE algorithmen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Statistically Constrained Minimum Mean Square Estimation Algorithm Which is Used For Human Head Tissue Conductivity Estimation to Source Localizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf291b4ce-c625-4e8e-b2b7-b8cddbac6c7b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf291b4ce-c625-4e8e-b2b7-b8cddbac6c7b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa

Files

Collections