Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Different Implant Thread Designs and Diameters on All-On Concept

dc.contributor.author Zor, Z. F.
dc.contributor.author Kilinc, Y.
dc.contributor.author Erkmen, E.
dc.contributor.author Kurt, A.
dc.contributor.other 01. Atılım University
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:16:59Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:16:59Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830 en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim All-on-four concept involves the use of four anterior dental implants in the edentulous jaw to overcome anatomic limitations of residual alveolar bone. The impact of implant thread design and diameter on the biomechanical performance of all-on-four concept is not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of all-on-four concept with different combinations of thread designs and diameters through a three dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Materials and methods Six three-dimensional finite element models of edentulous mandible were developed. The models included the combinations of 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter implants with active and passive thread designs. Vertical, oblique and horizontal loads were applied anterior to the end of the cantilever. Von Mises, maximum principal and minimum principal stresses were analysed. Results The results indicated a tendency towards stress reduction in Von Mises stress values of dental implants with the increase in diameter for both mesial and distal implants. In narrow implants active thread design resulted in lower Von Mises stress values than passive thread design. Active thread design demonstrated higher bone stress when compared to passive thread design. The analysis also revealed the importance of mesial implant for diminishing stresses on the distal implant and their surrounding bone under horizontal and oblique loading. Conclusion The comparison of the models suggest that use of wide implant is advantageous in the all-on-four concept. There is a biomechanical advantage in using narrow implants with active thread design in horizontally inadequate bone. The thread design was more significant in terms of increasing bone stress than implant diameter. The mesial implant influences the biomechanical behavior of the whole design, contributing to a more favorable stress distribution under horizontal and oblique loading conditions. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.1
dc.identifier.issn 2036-413X
dc.identifier.issn 2036-4121
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85121111218
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1704
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ariesdue Srl en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Osseointegration
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject All-on-four en_US
dc.subject Dental implants en_US
dc.subject finite element analysis en_US
dc.subject Mandible en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Different Implant Thread Designs and Diameters on All-On Concept en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830
gdc.author.scopusid 55966089200
gdc.author.scopusid 24171196000
gdc.author.scopusid 8250449600
gdc.author.scopusid 8520541100
gdc.author.wosid Kılınç, Yeliz/AAP-6529-2021
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Zor, Z. F.; Kilinc, Y.; Erkmen, E.] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, A.] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 108 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 101 en_US
gdc.description.volume 13 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W3201213573
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000727414200001
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.583162E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.684737E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.242
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.43
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 14
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 2
gdc.scopus.citedcount 2
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd

Files

Collections