Δ-Shock Model Based on Polya Process and Its Optimal Replacement Policy
Loading...

Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Science Bv
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Shock models are of great interest in engineering reliability. Among the others, the delta-shock model has been widely studied in the literature. In this model, the system breaks down due to the arrivals of two successive shocks which are too close to each other. That is, the system fails when the time between two consecutive shocks falls below a fixed threshold delta. In the literature, the delta-shock model has been mostly studied by assuming that shocks arrive according to a renewal process so that the interarrival times between shocks are independent and identically distributed. In the current paper, we consider the case when the shock arrival process is described by a Polya process which has dependent interarrival times. In particular, we obtain survival function and mean lifetime of the system and study the optimal replacement policy for the delta-shock model based on Polya process. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Eryilmaz, Serkan/0000-0002-2108-1781
ORCID
Keywords
Reliability, delta-shock model, Optimal replacement policy, Pareto distribution, Polya process, \(\delta\)-shock model, Applications of renewal theory (reliability, demand theory, etc.), reliability, Pareto distribution, optimal replacement policy, Polya process, Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research, Point processes (e.g., Poisson, Cox, Hawkes processes)
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0101 mathematics, 01 natural sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
70
Source
European Journal of Operational Research
Volume
263
Issue
2
Start Page
690
End Page
697
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 79
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 15
SCOPUS™ Citations
79
checked on Mar 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
74
checked on Mar 09, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Mar 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


