Does real UK GDP have a unit root? Evidence from a multi-century perspective

dc.authorscopusid6504067358
dc.authorscopusid18037301200
dc.authorscopusid7406289288
dc.authorscopusid23978235900
dc.contributor.authorCanarella, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Rangan
dc.contributor.authorMillera, Stephen M.
dc.contributor.authorOmay, Tolga
dc.contributor.otherEconomics
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:40:23Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Canarella, Giorgio; Millera, Stephen M.] Univ Nevada, Dept Econ, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA; [Gupta, Rangan] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, Pretoria, South Africa; [Omay, Tolga] Atilim Univ, Dept Econ, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe employ linear and nonlinear unit-root tests to examine the stationarity of five multi-century historical U.K. series of real output compiled by the Bank of England. Three series span 1270 to 2016 and two series span 1700 to 2016. These datasets represent the longest span of historical real output data available and, thus, provide the environment for which unit-root tests are most powerful. A key feature of our test is its simultaneous allowance for two types of nonlinearity: time-dependent (structural breaks) nonlinearity and state-dependent (asymmetric adjustment) nonlinearity. The key finding of the test, contrary to what other more popular nonlinear unit-root tests suggest, provides strong evidence that the main structure of the five series is a stationary process characterized by an asymmetric nonlinear adjustment and a permanent break affecting both the intercept and the trend. A major policy implication of this finding is fiscal and/or monetary stabilization policies have only temporary effects on the output levels of the United Kingdom.en_US
dc.identifier.citation4
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00036846.2019.1655138
dc.identifier.endpage1087en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-6846
dc.identifier.issn1466-4283
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85072098282
dc.identifier.startpage1070en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1655138
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/3334
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000484909600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorOmay, Tolga
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUnit rooten_US
dc.subjecttime-dependenceen_US
dc.subjectnonlinearityen_US
dc.subjectstate-dependenceen_US
dc.subjectFourier functionen_US
dc.titleDoes real UK GDP have a unit root? Evidence from a multi-century perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc49f4d4e-0fdb-400e-ba3c-62ec300b5c96
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc49f4d4e-0fdb-400e-ba3c-62ec300b5c96
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf17c3770-9c6e-4de2-90e7-73c30275c2f9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf17c3770-9c6e-4de2-90e7-73c30275c2f9

Files

Collections