Use/Misuse of Chinese Bri Investment? Bri-Related Crony Capitalism in Turkey

dc.contributor.author Yildirim, Nilgun Elikucuk
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Gozde
dc.contributor.author Eliküçük Yildirim, Nilgün
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:24:23Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:24:23Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-24
dc.description Elikucuk Yildirim, Nilgun/0000-0002-4006-1401; Yilmaz, Gozde/0000-0003-3015-568X en_US
dc.description.abstract Crony capitalism as a type of capitalism entailing the close relations of political authorities and business circles based on mutual profit maximization is not a new phenomenon in Turkey. However, crony relations have accelerated with the Justice and Development Party (Adalet Kalkinma Partisi - AKP) rule. Despite growing scholarly work on crony relations in the AKP era, the literature remains inward-oriented without analysing the external dimension of crony capitalism, which this article intends to alleviate by providing an analysis of crony capitalism and bringing back the external dimension through an analysis of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)-related crony relations. It argues that the case of Turkey demonstrates how the BRI is used to feed instrumental cronyism without the promotion of China and how recipient countries use and misuse Chinese BRI investments to create alternative resources for the government's cronies. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port project is another important example of how BRI projects turn into tools of cronyism for the political elites of host countries (Ferchen and Perera , 1–2). The Sri Lanka Port Authority signed a joint venture agreement with a Chinese SOE to develop the Hambantota port, and the funding for the project was provided by Exim Bank of China. However, this unsound mega-project eventually turned into a debt crisis, and Sri Lanka could not pay its debts to Exim Bank. China’s provision of a rescue package for Sri Lanka by leasing the Hambantota port for 99 years (Panda ) has led to discussions of China’s takeover of strategic ports through debt-equity swaps. However, there is another story behind this port failure, as the port was a part of Sri Lanka’s own development strategy and was not offered by China (Jones and Hameiri , 13). Furthermore, the Sri Lanka Port Authority, as an inefficient state-owned company (Brautigam ), is also responsible for the outcome as it prioritized politics and corrupt decisions when bargaining with China (Ferchen and Perera ).
dc.description.sponsorship Exim Bank of China; Sri Lanka Port Authority
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/14683857.2022.2114194
dc.identifier.issn 1468-3857
dc.identifier.issn 1743-9639
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85137011030
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2022.2114194
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2428
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject BRI en_US
dc.subject China en_US
dc.subject crony capitalism en_US
dc.subject cronyism en_US
dc.subject Turkey en_US
dc.title Use/Misuse of Chinese Bri Investment? Bri-Related Crony Capitalism in Turkey en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Elikucuk Yildirim, Nilgun/0000-0002-4006-1401
gdc.author.id Yilmaz, Gozde/0000-0003-3015-568X
gdc.author.scopusid 57211575767
gdc.author.scopusid 57216480820
gdc.author.wosid Elikucuk Yildirim, Nilgun/AAG-3156-2020
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Yildirim, Nilgun Elikucuk; Yilmaz, Gozde] Atilim Univ, Dept Int Relat, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 383 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 365 en_US
gdc.description.volume 23 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Social Science Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4293226589
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000844715600001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 5.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.439659E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 4.95962E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0507 social and economic geography
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0506 political science
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 5.03
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.95
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 4
gdc.plumx.facebookshareslikecount 65
gdc.plumx.mendeley 11
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 5
gdc.scopus.citedcount 5
gdc.wos.citedcount 7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 2c8f77da-f226-4fb9-ac50-3d1e66f69796
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b3c782da-f24f-4fb9-9868-3cc3f1f9f736

Files

Collections