Criticality and burn up evolutions of the Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor with alternative fuels

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2010

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Organizational Unit
Department of Mechanical Engineering
(2016)
The Mechanical Engineering Doctoral Program has started in 2016-2017 academic year. We have highly qualified teaching and research faculty members and strong research infrastructure in the department for graduate work. Research areas include computational and experimental research in fluid and solid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, advanced manufacturing, composites and other advanced materials. Our fundamental mission is to train engineers who are able to work with advanced technology, create innovative approaches and authentic designs, apply research methods effectively, conduct research and develop high quality methods and products in space, aviation, defense, medical and automotive industries, with a contemporary education and research infrastructure.

Journal Issue

Abstract

Time evolution of criticality and burn-up grades of the Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor (FBNR) are investigated for alternative fuels. These are: (1) low enriched uranium, (2) weapon grade plutonium, (3) reactor grade plutonium, and (4) minor actinides in the spent fuel of light water reactors (LWRs). The criticality calculations are conducted with SCALE 5.1 using S(8)-P(3) approximation in 238 neutron energy groups with 90 groups in thermal energy region. The main results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) Low enriched uranium (UO(2)): FBNR with an enrichment grade of 9% and 19% will start with k(eff) = 1.2744 and k(eff) = 1.36 and can operate similar to 8 and >15 years with the same fuel charge, where criticality drops to k(eff) = 1.06 and a burn-up grade of 54 000 and >110000 MW.D/t can be attained. (2) Weapon grade plutonium: Such a high quality nuclear fuel suggests to be mixed with thorium. Second series of criticality calculations are conducted with fuel compositions made of thoria (ThO(2)) and weapon grade PuO(2), where PuO(2) component has been varied from 1% to 100%. Criticality with k(eff) > 1.0 is achieved by similar to 2.5% PuO(2). At 4% PuO(2), the reactor criticality will become satisfactory (k(eff) = 1.1121), rapidly increasing with more PuO(2). A reasonable mixture will by around 20% PuO(2) and 80% ThO(2) with a k(eff) = 1.2864. This mixed fuel would allow full power reactor operation for >20 years and burn-up grade can reach 136 000 MW.D/t. (3) Reactor grade plutonium: Third series of criticality calculations are conducted with fuel compositions made of thoria and reactor grade PuO(2), where PuO(2) is varied from 1% to 100%. Reactor becomes critical by 8% PuO(2) content. One can achieve k(eff) = 1.2670 by 35% PuO(2) and would allow full power reactor operation also for >20 years and burn-up grade can reach 123 000 MW.D/t. (4) Minor actinides in the spent fuel of LWRs: Fourth series of criticality calculations are conducted with fuel compositions made of thoria and MAO(2), where MAO(2) is varied from 1% to 100%. Reactor becomes critical by similar to 17% MAO(2) content. Reasonably high reactor criticality (k(eff) = 1.2673) is achieved by 50% MAO(2) for a reactor operation time of 15 years with a burn up of 86 000 MW.D/t without fuel change. On that way, the hazardous nuclear waste product can be transmuted as well as utilized as fuel. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor, Thorium, Minor actinides, Plutonium

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Citation

33

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Source

14th International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems -- JUN 29-JUL 03, 2009 -- Ericeira, PORTUGAL

Volume

51

Issue

9

Start Page

1781

End Page

1787

Collections