Estimation of Discretization Uncertainty Using the γ - Re<sub>θ</sub> Transition Model for Transitional Flows on 6:1 Spheroid

dc.authoridatik, hediye/0000-0002-5858-9132
dc.authorscopusid24464751900
dc.authorwosidatik, hediye/AAH-9274-2020
dc.contributor.authorAtik, Hediye
dc.contributor.otherAerospace Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:24:02Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:24:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Atik, Hediye] Atilim Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionatik, hediye/0000-0002-5858-9132en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to estimate the surface mesh size related discretization uncertainties using the gamma-Re-theta transition model combined with the shear stress transport (SST) k-omega turbulence model. For comparison, this work employs an available experimental study performed with a 6:1 prolate spheroid. The grid convergence index (GCI) study is performed for axial force, surface skin friction, and pressure coefficients with three levels of meshes. The transition model estimates the axial force coefficients (CX), approximately half of which are obtained using fully turbulent calculations with higher GCI values. The GCI values around the axial force coefficients for the level-2 mesh are less than 1% based on fully turbulent calculations. However, with the transition model, these values for the same mesh level increase to 10%. While the GCI values of surface pressure coefficients are very small based on both fully turbulent and transition model calculations, these coefficients show differences at the trailing part of the spheroid. Significant differences are also observed in the surface friction coefficients. While the model captures drastic changes in terms of transition in the surface friction coefficients at the suction side of the spheroid, such drastic change is not observed in fully turbulent calculations. On the other hand, there is no sign of any transition phenomenon at the pressure side, contrary to the observations of experimental measurements. The transition model is not able to estimate the transition front geometry correctly. The GCI values of the surface friction coefficients increase dramatically, up to 765% around the transition regions.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4054740
dc.identifier.issn0098-2202
dc.identifier.issn1528-901X
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85144291526
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054740
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2378
dc.identifier.volume144en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000857345700003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.institutionauthorAtik, Hediye
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsmeen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword Available]en_US
dc.titleEstimation of Discretization Uncertainty Using the γ - Re<sub>θ</sub> Transition Model for Transitional Flows on 6:1 Spheroiden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcafb006e-8632-4b80-9880-2d709e1eefb5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycafb006e-8632-4b80-9880-2d709e1eefb5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication50ae167a-5d1c-47d3-846d-89f142eb0c15
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery50ae167a-5d1c-47d3-846d-89f142eb0c15

Files

Collections