Estimation of Discretization Uncertainty Using the Γ - Re<sub>θ</Sub> Transition Model for Transitional Flows on 6:1 Spheroid

dc.authorid atik, hediye/0000-0002-5858-9132
dc.authorscopusid 24464751900
dc.authorwosid atik, hediye/AAH-9274-2020
dc.contributor.author Atik, Hediye
dc.contributor.other Aerospace Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:24:02Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:24:02Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Atik, Hediye] Atilim Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description atik, hediye/0000-0002-5858-9132 en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper aims to estimate the surface mesh size related discretization uncertainties using the gamma-Re-theta transition model combined with the shear stress transport (SST) k-omega turbulence model. For comparison, this work employs an available experimental study performed with a 6:1 prolate spheroid. The grid convergence index (GCI) study is performed for axial force, surface skin friction, and pressure coefficients with three levels of meshes. The transition model estimates the axial force coefficients (CX), approximately half of which are obtained using fully turbulent calculations with higher GCI values. The GCI values around the axial force coefficients for the level-2 mesh are less than 1% based on fully turbulent calculations. However, with the transition model, these values for the same mesh level increase to 10%. While the GCI values of surface pressure coefficients are very small based on both fully turbulent and transition model calculations, these coefficients show differences at the trailing part of the spheroid. Significant differences are also observed in the surface friction coefficients. While the model captures drastic changes in terms of transition in the surface friction coefficients at the suction side of the spheroid, such drastic change is not observed in fully turbulent calculations. On the other hand, there is no sign of any transition phenomenon at the pressure side, contrary to the observations of experimental measurements. The transition model is not able to estimate the transition front geometry correctly. The GCI values of the surface friction coefficients increase dramatically, up to 765% around the transition regions. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1115/1.4054740
dc.identifier.issn 0098-2202
dc.identifier.issn 1528-901X
dc.identifier.issue 11 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85144291526
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054740
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2378
dc.identifier.volume 144 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000857345700003
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.institutionauthor Atik, Hediye
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Asme en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject [No Keyword Available] en_US
dc.title Estimation of Discretization Uncertainty Using the Γ - Re<sub>θ</Sub> Transition Model for Transitional Flows on 6:1 Spheroid en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication cafb006e-8632-4b80-9880-2d709e1eefb5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery cafb006e-8632-4b80-9880-2d709e1eefb5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50ae167a-5d1c-47d3-846d-89f142eb0c15
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 50ae167a-5d1c-47d3-846d-89f142eb0c15

Files

Collections