Biomechanical evaluation of a fiber-reinforced composite prosthesis supported by implants with and without a microthread collar design

dc.authoridERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authorscopusid8935861400
dc.authorscopusid8250449600
dc.authorscopusid8520541100
dc.authorscopusid26967503300
dc.authorscopusid57220460911
dc.authorwosidErkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.authorMeric, Gokce
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorEser, Atilim
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:16:08Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:16:08Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Meric, Gokce] Near East Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent, TR-10 Nicosia Cyprus, Mersin, Turkey; [Erkmen, Erkan] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet; Celik, Gokhan] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey; [Eser, Atilim] Univ Aachen, Inst Mat Applicat Med Engn, D-5100 Aachen, Germanyen_US
dc.descriptionERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: A fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) resin system was introduced as an alternative for implant-retained fixed dental prostheses (FDPs); however, the stress distribution in the bone around the implants which support the FRC-FDP has so far not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of FRC-FDPs supported by implants with different collar geometries. Materials and methods: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis method was selected to evaluate the stress distribution. FRC-FDPs were supported by 2 different dental implant systems with 2 distinct collar geometries: a microthread collar structure (MCS) and a non-MCS (NMCS). In separate load cases, 300-N vertical, 150-N oblique, and 60-N horizontal forces were simulated. Tensile and compressive stress values in the cortical and cancellous bone and von Mises stresses in the fixture-abutment complex, the framework, and veneer material were calculated. Results: The MCS model revealed higher compression stresses at the cortical bone than did the NMCS model under all 3 load conditions. Moreover, higher tensile stresses under the oblique loads at the cortical bone were shown with the MCS model. In each model, stresses were much higher in the implant abutment complex than in the cortical bone, and they were very low in the cancellous bone. Conclusion: Although additional experimental and clinical studies are needed, FRC-FDPs can be considered a suitable and alternative treatment choice for an implant-supported prosthesis. The implant design and geometry affect the load-transmission mechanisms. Implants with an MCS that supports FRC-FDPs were shown to be superior in terms of the stress distribution in the bone around the implant compared to implants with an NMCS. Copyright (C) 2010, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citation8
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jds.2010.11.010
dc.identifier.endpage208en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79952814503
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2010.11.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1603
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000286018400004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectcompositeen_US
dc.subjectimplantsen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of a fiber-reinforced composite prosthesis supported by implants with and without a microthread collar designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections