Assessing team work in engineering projects

dc.authorscopusid15730011900
dc.authorscopusid35610828900
dc.authorscopusid56422190200
dc.contributor.authorMıshra, Deepti
dc.contributor.authorOstrovska, Sofiya
dc.contributor.authorHacaloğlu, Tuna
dc.contributor.otherMathematics
dc.contributor.otherComputer Engineering
dc.contributor.otherInformation Systems Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T11:15:28Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T11:15:28Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempMishra D., Department of Computer Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey; Ostrovska S., Department of Mathematics, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey; Hacaloglu T., Department of Information Systems Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractTeam work is considered a valuable teaching technique in higher education. However, the assessment of an individual's work in teams has proved to be a challenging task. Consequently, self- and peer-evaluations are becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of individuals in a team work, though it is essential to determine whether students can judge their ownas well as their peer's performance effectively. Self- and peer-evaluations have been applied in different disciplines and their authenticity with regard to teacher's assessment has been evaluated in the literature but this issue has not been investigated in the field of engineering education so far. In this study, a peer- and self-assessment procedure is applied to the evaluation of a project work conducted in teams of 3 or 4 students. The participants were engineering students taking two similar courses related with database design and development. It is found that a majority of the students were unable to assess themselves as objectively as their instructor. Further, it is observed that successful students tend to under-estimate, whereas unsuccessful students tend to over-estimate, their own performance. The paper also establishes that the results of self-assessments are independent from the gender factor. © 2015 TEMPUS Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citation12
dc.identifier.doi[SCOPUS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-149]
dc.identifier.endpage634en_US
dc.identifier.issn0949-149X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84925013294
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage627en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/9425
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTempus Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Engineering Educationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEngineering educationen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectSelf-assessmenten_US
dc.subjectTeam worken_US
dc.subjectZ-testen_US
dc.titleAssessing team work in engineering projectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb675e894-7114-4e7c-8f17-24d8e0f07ca4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationaf5756ab-54dd-454a-ac68-0babf2e35b43
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3ed58a9-ec7a-4537-bd73-68342f5537fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb675e894-7114-4e7c-8f17-24d8e0f07ca4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication31ddeb89-24da-4427-917a-250e710b969c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationcf0fb36c-0500-438e-b4cc-ad1d4ef25579
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery31ddeb89-24da-4427-917a-250e710b969c

Files

Collections