Comparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers With Prismatic, Tapered, and Free Forms

dc.authoridASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607X
dc.authorwosidIlgın, Hüseyin Emre/HHS-4281-2022
dc.authorwosidASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/JNT-0231-2023
dc.contributor.authorIlgin, Huseyin Emre
dc.contributor.authorAslantamer, Ozlem Nur
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-05T20:49:31Z
dc.date.available2024-12-05T20:49:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Ilgin, Huseyin Emre] Tampere Univ, Fac Built Environm, Sch Architecture, POB 600, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; [Aslantamer, Ozlem Nur] Atilim Univ, Fac Art Design & Architecture, Dept Interior Architecture & Environm Design, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607Xen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study offers a thorough comparative analysis of space efficiency in skyscrapers across three distinct forms: prismatic, tapered, and free. By examining case studies from each form category, this research investigates how architectural and structural design features impact space utilization in supertall towers. The findings reveal form-based differences in space efficiency and design element usage. In prismatic skyscrapers, which are primarily residential and utilize concrete outrigger frames, the average space efficiency was around 72%, with the core occupying 24% of the gross floor area (GFA). Tapered skyscrapers, commonly mixed-use with composite outrigger frames, showed an average space efficiency of over 70%, with a core-to-GFA ratio of 26%. Freeform towers, often mixed-use and using composite outrigger frames, demonstrated a space efficiency of 71%, with an average core-to-GFA ratio of 26%. Despite these variations, a consistent trend emerged: as the height of a building increases, there is a general decline in space efficiency, highlighting the challenges in optimizing space in taller structures. This analysis adds to the understanding of skyscraper design and space utilization, providing important insights for architects and urban planners aiming to improve the efficiency of future high-rise developments.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings14113345
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85210261942
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113345
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001366849900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount0
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectFreeen_US
dc.subjectPrismaticen_US
dc.subjectSkyscraperen_US
dc.subjectSpace Efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectTapereden_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers With Prismatic, Tapered, and Free Formsen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount0
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
.Comparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections