Comparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers With Prismatic, Tapered, and Free Forms

dc.authorid ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607X
dc.authorwosid Ilgın, Hüseyin Emre/HHS-4281-2022
dc.authorwosid ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/JNT-0231-2023
dc.contributor.author Ilgin, Huseyin Emre
dc.contributor.author Aslantamer, Ozlem Nur
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-05T20:49:31Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-05T20:49:31Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Ilgin, Huseyin Emre] Tampere Univ, Fac Built Environm, Sch Architecture, POB 600, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; [Aslantamer, Ozlem Nur] Atilim Univ, Fac Art Design & Architecture, Dept Interior Architecture & Environm Design, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye en_US
dc.description ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607X en_US
dc.description.abstract This study offers a thorough comparative analysis of space efficiency in skyscrapers across three distinct forms: prismatic, tapered, and free. By examining case studies from each form category, this research investigates how architectural and structural design features impact space utilization in supertall towers. The findings reveal form-based differences in space efficiency and design element usage. In prismatic skyscrapers, which are primarily residential and utilize concrete outrigger frames, the average space efficiency was around 72%, with the core occupying 24% of the gross floor area (GFA). Tapered skyscrapers, commonly mixed-use with composite outrigger frames, showed an average space efficiency of over 70%, with a core-to-GFA ratio of 26%. Freeform towers, often mixed-use and using composite outrigger frames, demonstrated a space efficiency of 71%, with an average core-to-GFA ratio of 26%. Despite these variations, a consistent trend emerged: as the height of a building increases, there is a general decline in space efficiency, highlighting the challenges in optimizing space in taller structures. This analysis adds to the understanding of skyscraper design and space utilization, providing important insights for architects and urban planners aiming to improve the efficiency of future high-rise developments. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/buildings14113345
dc.identifier.issn 2075-5309
dc.identifier.issue 11 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85210261942
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113345
dc.identifier.volume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001366849900001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mdpi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Diğer en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Comparison en_US
dc.subject Free en_US
dc.subject Prismatic en_US
dc.subject Skyscraper en_US
dc.subject Space Efficiency en_US
dc.subject Tapered en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers With Prismatic, Tapered, and Free Forms en_US
dc.type Review en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
.Comparative Analysis of Space Efficiency in Skyscrapers.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections