Recovery of Iron from Turkish and Iranian Red Muds

dc.authoridTOPKAYA, YAVUZ/0009-0009-3671-3655
dc.authorscopusid57214777802
dc.authorscopusid6504342315
dc.authorscopusid6602494621
dc.authorscopusid6506436603
dc.contributor.authorEray, Said
dc.contributor.authorKeskinkilic, Ender
dc.contributor.authorTopkaya, Yavuz A.
dc.contributor.authorGeveci, Ahmet
dc.contributor.otherMetallurgical and Materials Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:16:47Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:16:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Eray, Said] Ibrahim Cecen Univ Agri, TR-04100 Agri, Turkey; [Keskinkilic, Ender] Atilim Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkey; [Topkaya, Yavuz A.; Geveci, Ahmet] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionTOPKAYA, YAVUZ/0009-0009-3671-3655en_US
dc.description.abstractTurkish and Iranian red mud samples of different composition and mineralogy were processed by solid-state reduction followed by wet magnetic separation and smelting, two commonly used pyrometallurgical methods for iron recovery. The application of these two methods on the same samples allowed them to be compared thoroughly and to be examined for versatility. The results showed that it was possible to recover more than 90% of iron using both methods. However, the concentrate obtained by the first method contained a significant amount of undesirable oxides. Thus, large proportions (similar to 30%) of valuable elements that are planned to be recovered by hydrometallurgical methods were removed together with the iron. The smelting method, on the other hand, made it possible to recover the iron with high efficiency and as a marketable purity Fe-C alloy. The metal obtained by smelting contained 96% iron, 2% carbon, and a small amount of impurities like Si, Ti, and Na.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [117M185]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for the financial support given under Project No: 117M185. The authors also wish to express their thanks to Eti Aluminum Co. and Iran Alumina Co. for supplying the red mud samples.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11837-021-05076-0
dc.identifier.endpage464en_US
dc.identifier.issn1047-4838
dc.identifier.issn1543-1851
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123066855
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05076-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1654
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000742293000006
dc.institutionauthorKeskinkılıç, Ender
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword Available]en_US
dc.titleRecovery of Iron from Turkish and Iranian Red Mudsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb2acafb6-21d2-4a09-a5a7-22c3b354be7d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb2acafb6-21d2-4a09-a5a7-22c3b354be7d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication7cf7435b-3e8e-404e-adee-0f6f7dc8e070
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7cf7435b-3e8e-404e-adee-0f6f7dc8e070

Files

Collections