Space Efficiency in Timber Office Buildings

dc.authorid Ilgin, Huseyin Emre/0000-0001-8033-7823
dc.authorid ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607X
dc.authorscopusid 59124803900
dc.authorscopusid 57079996200
dc.authorwosid ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/JNT-0231-2023
dc.contributor.author Aslantamer, Ozlem Nur
dc.contributor.author Ilgin, Huseyin Emre
dc.contributor.other Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:23:09Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:23:09Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Aslantamer, Ozlem Nur] Atilim Univ, Fac Art Design & Architecture, Dept Interior Architecture & Environm Design, Ankara, Turkiye; [Ilgin, Huseyin Emre] Tampere Univ, Fac Built Environm, Sch Architecture, Tampere, Finland en_US
dc.description Ilgin, Huseyin Emre/0000-0001-8033-7823; ASLANTAMER, Ozlem Nur/0000-0001-7776-607X en_US
dc.description.abstract Timber offices indicate a growing field, principally thanks to their potential to offer noteworthy ecological and financial gains over their entire life. Like many other building types, space efficiency is a crucial design parameter in timber structures to ensure a project's feasibility. This factor is especially significant in office buildings, where maximizing rental income reflects effective planning. Currently, there is a lack of exhaustive inquiry providing a thorough insight of space efficiency in modern timber office buildings. This study fills this gap in the literature by collecting data from 33 buildings through literature reviews and case study method to investigate space efficiency with the key architectural and structural factors that influence it. The results showed that: (i) central cores stood out as the prevailing core layouts, while peripheral arrangements were noted as alternative preferences. Prismatic shapes emerged as the most favored options; (ii) timber was extensively used as a primary building material, closely followed by combinations of timber and concrete. Load-bearing systems mainly relied on shear walled frames and configurations; (iii) average space utilization across examined cases was 88 %, with variances ranging from 75 % to 95 % among different instances; (iv) average ratio of core area to GFA was 10 %, showing variations between 4 % and 19 % across various scenarios; and (v) there were no substantial variances noted in the effect of different core planning strategies on spatial efficiency. Similar conclusions were drawn regarding building forms and structural materials. Our paper will assist in crafting design principles customized for diverse stakeholders, including architectural designers of timber offices. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109618
dc.identifier.issn 2352-7102
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85193448100
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109618
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2268
dc.identifier.volume 91 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001244546900001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.institutionauthor Aslantamer, Özlem Nur
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 5
dc.subject Timber en_US
dc.subject Office en_US
dc.subject Gross floor area (GFA) en_US
dc.subject Net floor area (NFA) en_US
dc.subject Space efficiency en_US
dc.title Space Efficiency in Timber Office Buildings en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 5
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication dd5c751a-ea52-4ff2-88ae-a0970df7ca77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery dd5c751a-ea52-4ff2-88ae-a0970df7ca77
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4655bfd7-34bf-42d6-aeea-39f55557214b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4655bfd7-34bf-42d6-aeea-39f55557214b

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Space efficiency in timber office.pdf
Size:
4.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections