Stakeholder Relationships in the Framework of R&d-Based Startups: Evidence From Turkey

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Natl Research Univ Higher Sch Economics

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that R&D-based start-ups play a significant role in the economic growth of many countries. However, founding such an enterprise is a risky endeavor, one that requires a balance between the technological search process and business capabilities. Most of the time these varied skills are found among several different people. The task becomes more difficult for recent engineering school graduates who are neither scientists nor business people. Therefore, it is critical for these new techno-entrepreneurs to conscientiously work on building relationships with stakeholders through whom they might access scientific knowledge on one hand and commercial knowledge on the other. The paper explores the process of building relationships with stakeholders based on evidence from Turkish companies. It begins with a review of the literature, presenting the different theories concerning relationships with stakeholders as far as entrepreneurship is concerned. Then, it presents the methodology, coding and analysis of in-depth interviews with the founders of R&D-based start-ups. The case profiles are considered with a focus on the following issues: the counterbalancing of stakeholder power, learning by the entrepreneur as a by-product of interactions with stakeholders, and the earning of a reputation through ethical and passionate business practices. Building upon these preliminary findings, the author draws three main propositions that could be the subject of further research. The main finding of this paper is that there are two opposing forces affecting the development of an R&D-based start-up-challenger and supporter stakeholders. However, a stakeholder who was once a supporter could turn into a challenger or vice versa. The entrepreneur could benefit from the counterbalancing effect of these forces. Two major stakeholder groups emerged at the initial stage of the business: the family members and the state's grant-monitoring officers. Then, the ethical and passionate conduct of business by these start-ups could become a factor drawing third parties in, to become stakeholders of these start-ups. The nature and impact of these relationships should be researched further. Such an analysis allows one to understand how R&D-based startups are established and what kind of problems they face when turning (hopefully) into large corporations. On such a basis, this could help governments develop more suitable support programs that would benefit and expand the opportunities available to the founders of new R&Dbased firms.

Description

Kalayci, Elif/0000-0001-6658-0595

Keywords

technological entrepreneurship, stakeholder relationships, challenger stakeholder, supporter stakeholder, causation logic, effectuation logic, R&D-based startups, Turkey, Technological innovations. Automation, stakeholder relationships, HD45-45.2, supporter stakeholder, technological entrepreneurship, effectuation logic, causation logic, challenger stakeholder

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

05 social sciences, 0502 economics and business

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Foresight and STI Governance

Volume

11

Issue

3

Start Page

61

End Page

70

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 121

Scopus : 128

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 5865

SCOPUS™ Citations

2

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

4

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Page Views

4

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.47352665

Sustainable Development Goals

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo