Stakeholder Relationships in the Framework of R&d-Based Startups: Evidence From Turkey
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Natl Research Univ Higher Sch Economics
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that R&D-based start-ups play a significant role in the economic growth of many countries. However, founding such an enterprise is a risky endeavor, one that requires a balance between the technological search process and business capabilities. Most of the time these varied skills are found among several different people. The task becomes more difficult for recent engineering school graduates who are neither scientists nor business people. Therefore, it is critical for these new techno-entrepreneurs to conscientiously work on building relationships with stakeholders through whom they might access scientific knowledge on one hand and commercial knowledge on the other. The paper explores the process of building relationships with stakeholders based on evidence from Turkish companies. It begins with a review of the literature, presenting the different theories concerning relationships with stakeholders as far as entrepreneurship is concerned. Then, it presents the methodology, coding and analysis of in-depth interviews with the founders of R&D-based start-ups. The case profiles are considered with a focus on the following issues: the counterbalancing of stakeholder power, learning by the entrepreneur as a by-product of interactions with stakeholders, and the earning of a reputation through ethical and passionate business practices. Building upon these preliminary findings, the author draws three main propositions that could be the subject of further research. The main finding of this paper is that there are two opposing forces affecting the development of an R&D-based start-up-challenger and supporter stakeholders. However, a stakeholder who was once a supporter could turn into a challenger or vice versa. The entrepreneur could benefit from the counterbalancing effect of these forces. Two major stakeholder groups emerged at the initial stage of the business: the family members and the state's grant-monitoring officers. Then, the ethical and passionate conduct of business by these start-ups could become a factor drawing third parties in, to become stakeholders of these start-ups. The nature and impact of these relationships should be researched further. Such an analysis allows one to understand how R&D-based startups are established and what kind of problems they face when turning (hopefully) into large corporations. On such a basis, this could help governments develop more suitable support programs that would benefit and expand the opportunities available to the founders of new R&Dbased firms.
Description
Kalayci, Elif/0000-0001-6658-0595
ORCID
Keywords
technological entrepreneurship, stakeholder relationships, challenger stakeholder, supporter stakeholder, causation logic, effectuation logic, R&D-based startups, Turkey, Technological innovations. Automation, stakeholder relationships, HD45-45.2, supporter stakeholder, technological entrepreneurship, effectuation logic, causation logic, challenger stakeholder
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0502 economics and business
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Foresight and STI Governance
Volume
11
Issue
3
Start Page
61
End Page
70
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 121
Scopus : 128
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 5865
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
4
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Page Views
4
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.47352665
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY

3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


