The Effectiveness of Redistribution in Carbon Inequality: What About the Top 1%

dc.authorscopusid 59937855200
dc.authorscopusid 59893656700
dc.authorscopusid 56005626700
dc.authorwosid Boz, Arınç/Hph-0868-2023
dc.authorwosid Çaşkurlu, Eren/Abg-8040-2021
dc.authorwosid Ünalan, Gökhan/Lzg-2341-2025
dc.contributor.author Boz, Arinc
dc.contributor.author Unalan, Gokhan
dc.contributor.author Caskurlu, Eren
dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-06T00:26:48Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-06T00:26:48Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Boz, Arinc] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-67100 Zonguldak, Turkiye; [Unalan, Gokhan] Atilim Univ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye; [Caskurlu, Eren] Ankara Haci Bayram Veli Univ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract This study investigates the impact of income redistribution on carbon emissions across 154 countries from 1995 to 2023, with a particular focus on carbon inequality. Using a dynamic panel approach with two-step System GMM estimations, the analysis considers three dependent variables: average per capita emissions, top 1% per capita emissions, and the ratio of top 1% per capita emissions to national average per capita emissions. Results show that income redistribution (measured in both absolute and relative terms) significantly reduces average per capita emissions in the short term. However, redistribution has no mitigating effect on the carbon emissions of the top 1%; in some models, it is even associated with increases in elite emissions and a widening of carbon inequality. These findings suggest that while redistribution may contribute to national emission reductions, it is insufficient to curb the carbon-intensive lifestyles of the wealthiest. The analysis confirms the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and underscores the need for complementary policy tools to more effectively address the emissions of high-emitting individuals. Overall, this study contributes to the literature by linking income redistribution with emission disparities across income groups and highlights the importance of considering distributional dynamics in climate policy design. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su17114960
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue 11 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105007692563
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114960
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10658
dc.identifier.volume 17 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001506132700001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Carbon Inequality en_US
dc.subject Income Redistribution en_US
dc.subject Carbon Emissions en_US
dc.subject Top 1% Emissions en_US
dc.subject System Gmm en_US
dc.subject Environmental Kuznets Curve en_US
dc.title The Effectiveness of Redistribution in Carbon Inequality: What About the Top 1% en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files

Collections