A case study on the assessment of RF switch and splitter options for coupling of transceiver modules to bidirectional antennas employed in linear wireless sensor networks

dc.authoridKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619
dc.authorscopusid51763497600
dc.authorscopusid57240235700
dc.authorscopusid7102824862
dc.contributor.authorDalveren, Yaser
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ali
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:19:38Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:19:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Dalveren, Yaser] Atilim Univ, Dept Avion, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkey; [Durukan, Ahmet Mert] Atilim Univ, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkey; [Kara, Ali] Gazi Univ, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619en_US
dc.description.abstractRecently, a concept of linear wireless sensor networks (LWSNs) has attracted much attention. For such networks, one of the key challenges in sensor node design is to couple transceiver modules with bidirectional antennas placed back-to-back for opposite radiation. As is known, simply, this can be achieved by using well-known coupling options like radio frequency (RF) switch or splitter. However, it is important to decide between two seemingly equally good options according to the system requirements such as RF performance, power consumption, and cost. Therefore, this study aims to comparatively assess these options from the system level point of view to find out what advantages or disadvantages either provides as per the other from widespread use of them in a LWSN-based cathodic protection monitoring of oil and natural gas pipelines in extreme environments. Preliminary field tests are also conducted to validate the efficiency of coupling options for LWSN links. Results show that RF splitter offers low power consumption and cost whereas RF switch has advantages of low loss. Thus, it is believed that this study may provide useful insights to design bidirectional sensor links for LWSNs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [5160097]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the grant number 5160097.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mop.32954
dc.identifier.endpage2832en_US
dc.identifier.issn0895-2477
dc.identifier.issn1098-2760
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85113993486
dc.identifier.startpage2826en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mop.32954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1999
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000668463400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbidirectional antennaen_US
dc.subjectlinear wireless sensor networksen_US
dc.subjectRF splitteren_US
dc.subjectRF switchen_US
dc.subjectsensor nodeen_US
dc.titleA case study on the assessment of RF switch and splitter options for coupling of transceiver modules to bidirectional antennas employed in linear wireless sensor networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication55e082ac-14c0-46a6-b8fa-50c5e40b59c8
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbe728837-c599-49c1-8e8d-81b90219bb15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery55e082ac-14c0-46a6-b8fa-50c5e40b59c8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b

Files

Collections