Comparative Assessment and Performance Analysis of Interference Mitigation Techniques for Co-Existent Non-Geostationary and Geostationary Satellites

dc.authoridKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619
dc.authorscopusid57297464600
dc.authorscopusid56217996200
dc.authorscopusid7102824862
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Faik
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Elif
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ali
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T10:58:46Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T10:58:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Ozturk, Faik] TURKSAT AS, Satellite Operat, Ankara, Turkiye; [Ozturk, Faik] Atilim Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Ankara, Turkiye; [Aydin, Elif] Cankaya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkiye; [Kara, Ali] Gazi Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619en_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, technological developments with user demands, reduced production, and launch costs have rapidly increased the number of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites in space. Since LEO satellites use the same frequency band as existing Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, the interference coordination between the two satellite networks is vital. In order to minimize the co-existent interference between these satellite networks, studies perform on different interference mitigation strategies. In this paper, analysis and comparative assessment of these interference mitigation techniques are presented for the co-existent Non-Geostationary Earth (NGEO) and GEO systems. More specifically, power control (PC) and spatial isolation-based link adaptation (SILA) techniques are studied comparatively for the performance evaluation. It is shown that the communication link bandwidth is more efficiently utilized in the SILA technique when compared with the PC technique. Moreover, the multi-objective optimization problem (MOP) approach in the SILA technique is demonstrated to be more effective when compared with the single-objective optimization problem (SOP) approach used in the PC technique as the simultaneous prioritizing objective functions outperforms single prioritization. Finally, it is shown that when the PC technique is applied together with the SILA technique, the exclusive angle (EA) can be reduced up to 8% for 100 Mbps, and 8.5% for 200 Mbps transmission bit rates in different operational scenarios. The presented performance evaluation in this paper may help the satellite operator or decision-maker gain insights on which mitigation technique can be used in the case of a co-existent interference. This paper proposes analysis and comparative assessment of interference mitigation techniques for the co-existent Non-Geostationary Earth (NGEO) and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) systems. Spatial isolation-based link adaptation (SILA) and power control (PC) techniques are studied comparatively for the performance evaluation. The obtained optimization results show that the communication link bandwidth is more efficiently utilized in the SILA technique when compared with the PC technique because of the simultaneous prioritizing of objective functions. imageen_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dac.5956
dc.identifier.issn1074-5351
dc.identifier.issn1099-1131
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203512337
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5956
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/8946
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001309109300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Elif
dc.institutionauthorKara, Ali
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount0
dc.subjectco-existent interferenceen_US
dc.subjectexclusion zoneen_US
dc.subjectmulti-objective optimizationen_US
dc.subjectpower controlen_US
dc.subjectsatellite communicationen_US
dc.subjectspatial isolation-based link adaptationen_US
dc.titleComparative Assessment and Performance Analysis of Interference Mitigation Techniques for Co-Existent Non-Geostationary and Geostationary Satellitesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount0
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1d7a7c27-e329-4a72-b120-fae3e2d529b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbe728837-c599-49c1-8e8d-81b90219bb15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1d7a7c27-e329-4a72-b120-fae3e2d529b6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b

Files

Collections