Karakaya, Ziya

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/8509
Name Variants
Karakaya, Z
K.,Ziya
Ziya, Karakaya
K., Ziya
Z., Karakaya
Karakaya,Z.
Karakaya, Ziya
Z.,Karakaya
Job Title
Doktor Öğretim Üyesi
Email Address
ziya.karakaya@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
Computer Engineering
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

NO POVERTY1
NO POVERTY
0
Research Products
ZERO HUNGER2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
1
Research Products
QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
GENDER EQUALITY5
GENDER EQUALITY
0
Research Products
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
0
Research Products
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
0
Research Products
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
2
Research Products
REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
0
Research Products
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
0
Research Products
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
0
Research Products
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
0
Research Products
LIFE BELOW WATER14
LIFE BELOW WATER
1
Research Products
LIFE ON LAND15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
0
Research Products
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
0
Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

41

Articles

3

Views / Downloads

12/0

Supervised MSc Theses

13

Supervised PhD Theses

2

WoS Citation Count

78

Scopus Citation Count

98

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

1.90

Scopus Citations per Publication

2.39

Open Access Source

4

Supervised Theses

15

JournalCount
UBMK 2018 - 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering -- 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering, UBMK 2018 -- 20 September 2018 through 23 September 2018 -- Sarajevo -- 1435604
3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) -- SEP 20-23, 2018 -- Sarajevo, BOSNIA & HERCEG3
2017 International Conference on Computer and Applications, ICCA 2017 -- 2017 International Conference on Computer and Applications, ICCA 2017 -- 6 September 2017 through 7 September 2017 -- Doha -- 1315022
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) -- 7th International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2007 -- 27 May 2007 through 30 May 2007 -- Beijing -- 708232
2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) -- OCT 05-08, 2017 -- Antalya, TURKEY1
Current Page: 1 / 4

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2016 - 20175
Reset filters

Settings

Has files: falseSubject: Spark

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 25
    A Comparison of Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017) Karakaya,Z.; Yazici,A.; Alayyoub,M.
    This study compares the performance of Big Data Stream Processing frameworks including Apache Spark, Flink, and Storm. Also, it measures the resource usage and performance scalability of the frameworks against a varying number of cluster sizes. It has been observed that, Flink outperforms both Spark and Storm under equal constraints. However, Spark can be optimized to provide the higher throughput than Flink with the cost of higher latency. © 2017 IEEE.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    A Comparison of Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017) Karakaya,Z.; Yazici,A.; Alayyoub,M.
    This study compares the performance of Big Data Stream Processing frameworks including Apache Spark, Flink, and Storm. Also, it measures the resource usage and performance scalability of the frameworks against a varying number of cluster sizes. It has been observed that, Flink outperforms both Spark and Storm under equal constraints. However, Spark can be optimized to provide the higher throughput than Flink with the cost of higher latency. © 2017 IEEE.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 28
    A Comparison of Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Ieee, 2017) Karakaya, Ziya; Yazici, Ali; Alayyoub, Mohammed
    This study compares the performance of Big Data Stream Processing frameworks including Apache Spark, Flink, and Storm. Also, it measures the resource usage and performance scalability of the frameworks against a varying number of cluster sizes. It has been observed that, Flink outperforms both Spark and Storm under equal constraints. However, Spark can be optimized to provide the higher throughput than Flink with the cost of higher latency.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Systematic Mapping for Big Data Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Ieee, 2016) Alayyoub, Mohammed; Yazici, Ali; Karakaya, Ziya
    There has been lots of discussions about the choice of a stream processing framework (SPF) for Big Data. Each of the SPFs has different cutting edge technologies in their steps of processing the data in motion that gives them a better advantage over the others. Even though, the cutting edge technologies used in each stream processing framework might better them, it is still hard to say which framework bests the rest under different scenarios and conditions. in this study, we aim to show trends and differences about several SPFs for Big Data by using the Systematic Mapping (SM) approach. To achieve our objectives, we raise 6 research questions (RQs), in which 91 studies that conducted between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated. We present the trends by classifying the research on SPFs with respect to the proposed RQs which can help researchers to obtain an overview of the field.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    Systematic Mapping for Big Data Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016) Alayyoub,M.; Yazıcı, Ali; Yazici,A.; Karakaya,Z.; Karakaya, Ziya; Yazıcı, Ali; Karakaya, Ziya; Software Engineering; Computer Engineering; Software Engineering; Computer Engineering
    There has been lots of discussions about the choice of a stream processing framework (SPF) for Big Data. Each of the SPFs has different cutting edge technologies in their steps of processing the data in motion that gives them a better advantage over the others. Even though, the cutting edge technologies used in each stream processing framework might better them, it is still hard to say which framework bests the rest under different scenarios and conditions. In this study, we aim to show trends and differences about several SPFs for Big Data by using the Systematic Mapping (SM) approach. To achieve our objectives, we raise 6 research questions (RQs), in which 91 studies that conducted between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated. We present the trends by classifying the research on SPFs with respect to the proposed RQs which can help researchers to obtain an overview of the field. © 2016 IEEE.