Alemdaroğlu Temel, Mine

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/6816
Name Variants
M., Alemdaroğlu Temel
A. T. Mine
Alemdaroğlu Temel, Mine
Alemdaroğlu Temel,M.
Alemdaroglu Temel,Mine
Mine Alemdaroğlu Temel
M.,Alemdaroğlu Temel
Alemdaroglu Temel,M.
Mine, Alemdaroglu Temel
Mine, Alemdaroğlu Temel
Alemdaroglu Temel, Mine
A.T.Mine
M.,Alemdaroglu Temel
A., Mine
M., Alemdaroglu Temel
A.,Mine
Job Title
Öğretim Görevlisi
Email Address
mine.temel@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
Airframe and Powerplant Maintenance
Status
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0002-3467-9993
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

NO POVERTY1
NO POVERTY
0
Research Products
ZERO HUNGER2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
0
Research Products
QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
GENDER EQUALITY5
GENDER EQUALITY
0
Research Products
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
1
Research Products
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
1
Research Products
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
0
Research Products
REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
1
Research Products
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
0
Research Products
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
0
Research Products
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
0
Research Products
LIFE BELOW WATER14
LIFE BELOW WATER
0
Research Products
LIFE ON LAND15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
0
Research Products
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
0
Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

4

Articles

4

Views / Downloads

37/152

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

92

Scopus Citation Count

105

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

23.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

26.25

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology1
Applied Mathematics and Computation1
International Migration1
Journal of Applied Polymer Science1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20261
Reset filters

Settings

Subject: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Analytic Hierarchy Process in Determining Aircraft Basic Maintenance Training Durations
    (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2026) Acikel, Gurkan; Temel, Mine Alemdaroglu; Alemdaroğlu Temel, Mine
    Purpose - Currently, in aircraft basic maintenance training, it is determined that various aircraft basic maintenance training organizations around the world apply different basic maintenance durations for the same modules of the same licence categories. Aircraft basic maintenance training organizations are lacking a common curriculum with standard durations for the basic maintenance training modules. To remedy the problems associated with this issue, the purpose of this study is to develop and demonstrate a quantifiable reference (i.e. theoretical training and evaluation content intensity) based scientific theoretical method to determine the durations of the basic theoretical maintenance trainings held for B1.1 and B2 licence categories in aircraft basic maintenance training organizations. Design/methodology/approach - The total basic maintenance training duration was first allocated to basic, theoretical and practical maintenance trainings. The obtained basic theoretical maintenance training duration was then allocated to related modules and submodules by using weighted theoretical training content intensity and weighted theoretical evaluation content intensity, which were obtained by applying a multi-criteria decision-making approach using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Findings - In this study, it was found that there is no standardization upon aircraft basic maintenance training organizations for the allocation of the basic maintenance training durations to modules. To remedy this problem, a scientific method, which relies on quantifiable reference bases rather than subjective reasoning, is needed. The reference bases of the proposed theoretical method (i.e. theoretical training and evaluation content intensity) can be tuned with the inclusion of the effect of basic knowledge requirements through multi-criteria decision-making (AHP). The theoretical method proposed in this work is robust in terms of resulting in close proximity values of the basic theoretical maintenance training durations for the common modules of B1.1 and B2 licence categories. The theoretical method is proven to yield greater basic theoretical maintenance training durations for modules having greater theoretical training and evaluation content intensity and lower basic theoretical maintenance training durations for modules having less theoretical training and evaluation content intensity. A distinct similarity in terms of basic theoretical maintenance training durations and the ranking of the modules (in terms of durations) is not present when the average of the training organizations is compared to the results of the theoretical method. A quantifiable reference (i.e. theoretical training and evaluation content intensity) based scientific theoretical method to determine basic theoretical maintenance training durations was developed and demonstrated. Practical implications - Results of this study would especially be useful in an international effort to standardize the different basic theoretical maintenance training durations applied in various aircraft basic maintenance training organizations. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first in providing and demonstrating a scientific theoretical method based on a systematic, multi-criteria decision-making approach to determine the durations of the basic theoretical maintenance trainings.