Özkan, Barış

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/7767
Name Variants
B.,Özkan
Ö.,Barış
Ozkan, Baris
Barış, Özkan
Özkan, Barış
B., Ozkan
Baris, Ozkan
Özkan,B.
Ozkan,B.
B.,Ozkan
O.,Baris
O., Baris
Job Title
Doktor Öğretim Üyesi
Email Address
baris.ozkan@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
Information Systems Engineering
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

0

Research Products

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

0

Research Products

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

0

Research Products

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

0

Research Products

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

0

Research Products

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

0

Research Products

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

0

Research Products

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

0

Research Products

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

0

Research Products

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

0

Research Products

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo

0

Research Products

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

0

Research Products

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

1

Research Products

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

0

Research Products

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

0

Research Products

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo

0

Research Products

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

0

Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

11

Articles

2

Views / Downloads

0/0

Supervised MSc Theses

1

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

165

Scopus Citation Count

227

WoS h-index

2

Scopus h-index

4

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

15.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

20.64

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

1

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Joint Conference of 26th International Workshop on Software Measurement (IWSM) / 11th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (Mensura) -- OCT 05-07, 2016 -- Berlin, GERMANY2
Proceedings - 26th International Workshop on Software Measurement, IWSM 2016 and the 11th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, Mensura 2016 -- 26th International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 11th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, IWSM-Mensura 2016 -- 5 October 2016 through 7 October 2016 -- Berlin -- 1259362
CEUR Workshop Proceedings -- 8th Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium, UYMS 2014 -- 8 September 2014 through 10 September 2014 -- Guzelyurt -- 1091801
CEUR Workshop Proceedings -- 9th Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium, UYMS 2015 -- 9 September 2015 through 11 September 2015 -- Izmir -- 1176651
41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2015 -- AUG 26-28, 2015 -- Funchal, PORTUGAL1
Current Page: 1 / 2

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2016 - 20172
Reset filters

Settings

Subject: Functional Size

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 8
    On the Seven Misconceptions About Functional Size Measurement
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017) Ozkan,B.; Demirors,O.
    Among the various approaches to software size measurement, Functional Size Measurement has been widely recognized for its usability in early phases of software development cycles and its independence from implementation language, development method and technology. Starting from its introduction with the original Function Point Analysis method in 1979, functional size has been a favored input to estimation and productivity models. As a result of the search for solutions to emerging measurement needs and the advancements in the discipline of software measurement, FSM concepts have been redefined and measurement methods have matured with notable contributions from the ISO standardization process. Despite the progress towards an unambiguously defined and versatile measure in software engineering, several misconceptions about FSM in software community keep on leading to misuse of functional size and unproductive measurement practices. While such misperceptions results in disappointment and wasted resources, an important consequence is the disinterest in FSM. In this paper, we elaborate seven misconceptions in FSM. We review functional size and FSM by discussing the misconceptions. Our purpose is to give a state-of-the-art presentation of functional size and to guide software practitioners and researchers in applying FSM principles properly in their practices and software engineering methods and models. © 2016 IEEE.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 2
    On the Seven Misconceptions About Functional Size Measurement
    (Ieee, 2016) Ozkan, Baris; Demirors, Onur
    Among the various approaches to software size measurement, Functional Size Measurement has been widely recognized for its usability in early phases of software development cycles and its independence from implementation language, development method and technology. Starting from its introduction with the original Function Point Analysis method in 1979, functional size has been a favored input to estimation and productivity models. As a result of the search for solutions to emerging measurement needs and the advancements in the discipline of software measurement, FSM concepts have been redefined and measurement methods have matured with notable contributions from the ISO standardization process. Despite the progress towards an unambiguously defined and versatile measure in software engineering, several misconceptions about FSM in software community keep on leading to misuse of functional size and unproductive measurement practices. While such misperceptions results in disappointment and wasted resources, an important consequence is the disinterest in FSM. In this paper, we elaborate seven misconceptions in FSM. We review functional size and FSM by discussing the misconceptions. Our purpose is to give a state-of-the-art presentation of functional size and to guide software practitioners and researchers in applying FSM principles properly in their practices and software engineering methods and models.