Yılmaz, Gözde

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/6814
Name Variants
Yılmaz, Gözde
Yilmaz, Gozde
Y., Gözde
Gozde, Yilmaz
Y., Gozde
G.,Yilmaz
Yilmaz G.
Yılmaz,G.
Yilmaz,G.
Gözde, Yılmaz
G.,Yılmaz
Yilmaz,Gozde
Y.,Gözde
Y.,Gozde
Yllmaz G.
Gözde Yılmaz
G., Yilmaz
G., Yılmaz
Job Title
Profesör Doktor
Email Address
gozde.yilmaz@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
International Relations
Status
Website
https
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

NO POVERTY1
NO POVERTY
1
Research Products
ZERO HUNGER2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
1
Research Products
QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
GENDER EQUALITY5
GENDER EQUALITY
0
Research Products
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
0
Research Products
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
2
Research Products
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
0
Research Products
REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
5
Research Products
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
0
Research Products
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
0
Research Products
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
1
Research Products
LIFE BELOW WATER14
LIFE BELOW WATER
0
Research Products
LIFE ON LAND15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
11
Research Products
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
3
Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

59

Articles

24

Views / Downloads

263/3030

Supervised MSc Theses

21

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

232

Scopus Citation Count

315

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

3.93

Scopus Citations per Publication

5.34

Open Access Source

7

Supervised Theses

21

JournalCount
Southeast European and Black Sea Studies3
Non-Discrimination in Turkey3
Journal of Contemporary European Studies2
Democratization2
Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi2
Current Page: 1 / 4

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2016 - 201922020 - 20232
Reset filters

Settings

Has files: falseSubject: Europeanization

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 5
    Citation - Scopus: 7
    It Is Voluntary Transfer! Exploring Healthcare Reforms in Turkey
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde
    The Turkish healthcare system has been transformed in the 2000s by adopting a comprehensive health model - the so-called Turkish Model. Although Europeanization dynamics were effective in Turkey in recent decades due to the acceleration of European Union (EU) accession process after 1999, healthcare reforms demonstrate a distinct process. This article analyzes the factors behind the health transformation through employing a policy transfer framework. It argues that a parallel process of health-policy transfer with Europeanization in other areas emerged in Turkey, and rather than the EU push, the Turkish healthcare model was a result of voluntary engagement for eliminating problems in this domain.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 4
    Europeanization of Turkey and LGBTI Rights
    (Ankara Univ European Union Research Centre, 2020) Yilmaz, Gozde
    The European Union (EU) has established an advanced regime for non-discrimination and LGBTI rights have been included within this regime. EU candidate states are expected to be a part of this regime and launch Europeanizing reforms in the area. While, as an EU candidate state, Turkey is not immune from this, LGBTI rights have remained an area without any reform in the 2000s and even an area full with discrimination experiences. This article examines why there emerged no reforms during the increasing Europeanizing reforms in Turkey in the 2000s. The main argument is that the reasons of inertia in LGBTI rights in the 2000s' Turkey are the incapability of the EU for driving reforms and the negative mindset of the AKP regarding LGBTI-related issues.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 4
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Turkey in Between the Eu and China: From Europeanization To Cooperation With China
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2023) Yilmaz, Gozde; Yildirim, Nilgun Elikucuk; Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün
    Turkey has been on the path of EU membership since the 2000s, and the democratization process was well underway during the initial years of its candidacy. However, this trend was reversed substantially, with Turkey growing increasingly authoritarian during the 2010s. This substantial democratic backsliding has led to increasing authoritarian cooperation with the authoritarian powers on the rise, one of which is China, whose increasing engagement and cooperation with Turkey marked an alternative gravity centre for Turkey to be pulled by. This article argues that Turkey, in line with the worsening domestic authoritarianism, has been engaging with the authoritarian powers for survival rather than engaging with the EU, which provided legitimacy to the rule of the AKP during the initial years of its rule.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 58
    Citation - Scopus: 80
    From Europeanization To De-Europeanization: the Europeanization Process of Turkey in 1999-2014
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2016) Yilmaz, Gozde
    Turkey has been experiencing a controversial path of Europeanization by the 1999 Helsinki Summit granting EU candidate country status to the country: a changing trend from progressing Europeanization to selective Europeanization and recently de-Europeanization. Such a puzzling process, especially considering the recent de-Europeanization, is explored in this article through critically discussing the role of the EU and domestic factors. The article argues that the process has been influenced by EU conditionality in the early period of Europeanization and by the preferences of the Turkish government at the later stages, which also determine the direction of the reforms (i.e., Europeanization, de-Europeanization).