Benli, Hande Emin

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/7073
Name Variants
Emin-Benli, Hande
Hande Emin, Benli
B., Hande Emin
H.E.Benli
H. E. Benli
H.,Benli
Benli, Hande Emin
Benli,H.E.
B.,Hande Emin
H., Benli
Emin Benli, Hande
Job Title
Doktor Öğretim Üyesi
Email Address
hande.emin@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
International Trade and Logistics
Status
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
56695129400
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

0

Research Products

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

0

Research Products

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

0

Research Products

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

0

Research Products

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

0

Research Products

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo

2

Research Products

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

2

Research Products

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

0

Research Products

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

0

Research Products

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

0

Research Products

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

0

Research Products

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

0

Research Products

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

1

Research Products

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

0

Research Products

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

1

Research Products

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo

0

Research Products

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

0

Research Products
Documents

4

Citations

2

h-index

1

Go to Scopus profile
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

9

Articles

4

Views / Downloads

6/0

Supervised MSc Theses

2

Supervised PhD Theses

1

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

3

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi (Online)1
Handbook of Research on New Media Applications in Public Relations and Advertising1
Research Anthology on Macroeconomics and the Achievement of Global Stability1
Utilities Policy1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20151
Reset filters

Settings

Has files: falseSubject: Conflict of authority

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    The Political Economy of Margin Squeeze Liability in the Turkish Telecommunications Market: a Comparative Assessment
    (Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2015) Benli, Erman; Emin-Benli, Hande
    This paper studies the increasing importance of margin squeeze issue in the Turkish telecommunications market with a comparative assessment. Recent literature does not provide enough insight into the political economy of margin squeeze. The ideological background of the countries dominates their margin squeeze policies. The socialist experience and ordoliberal ideologies affect European Union (EU)'s margin squeeze policy. The EU policy leads to endorse margin squeeze as a standalone liability and it becomes relevant to the regulation and competition law. Turkey is one of the follower of the EU policy. However, the EU margin squeeze size does not fit to Turkey. The EU perspective is not an appropriate politically because it leads to the risk of conflict of authority. This risk has not existed yet in the EU because the EU has a supranational structure that allows the EU Commission to act as a central planner. However, the risk of conflict of authority is politically significant because Turkey is a nation state that does not allow the administrative authorities to act as a central planner. The EU margin squeeze policy is also not suitable for Turkey in terms of economics. Since, the EU approach leads to waste of resources. On the other hand, United States (US) courts endorse margin squeeze as a regulatory instrument and irrelevant to the imposition of antitrust law. The US practice seems to be more suitable for Turkey because it eliminates the risk of conflict of authority and waste of resources. The new Turkish regulatory framework on margin squeeze is more compatible with the US practices. Although the Turkish practice has formed under the influence of the Deutsche Telekom, Telefonica and Teliasonera cases, new margin squeeze regulation allows to follow the Linkline and Trinko decisions to ensure consumer welfare rather than competitors' profitability. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.