Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Entities
Browse GCRIS
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Alayyoub,M."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 25
    A Comparison of Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017) Karakaya,Z.; Yazici,A.; Alayyoub,M.
    This study compares the performance of Big Data Stream Processing frameworks including Apache Spark, Flink, and Storm. Also, it measures the resource usage and performance scalability of the frameworks against a varying number of cluster sizes. It has been observed that, Flink outperforms both Spark and Storm under equal constraints. However, Spark can be optimized to provide the higher throughput than Flink with the cost of higher latency. © 2017 IEEE.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    A Comparison of Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017) Karakaya,Z.; Yazici,A.; Alayyoub,M.
    This study compares the performance of Big Data Stream Processing frameworks including Apache Spark, Flink, and Storm. Also, it measures the resource usage and performance scalability of the frameworks against a varying number of cluster sizes. It has been observed that, Flink outperforms both Spark and Storm under equal constraints. However, Spark can be optimized to provide the higher throughput than Flink with the cost of higher latency. © 2017 IEEE.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    Systematic Mapping for Big Data Stream Processing Frameworks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016) Alayyoub,M.; Yazıcı, Ali; Yazici,A.; Karakaya,Z.; Karakaya, Ziya; Yazıcı, Ali; Karakaya, Ziya; Software Engineering; Computer Engineering; Software Engineering; Computer Engineering
    There has been lots of discussions about the choice of a stream processing framework (SPF) for Big Data. Each of the SPFs has different cutting edge technologies in their steps of processing the data in motion that gives them a better advantage over the others. Even though, the cutting edge technologies used in each stream processing framework might better them, it is still hard to say which framework bests the rest under different scenarios and conditions. In this study, we aim to show trends and differences about several SPFs for Big Data by using the Systematic Mapping (SM) approach. To achieve our objectives, we raise 6 research questions (RQs), in which 91 studies that conducted between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated. We present the trends by classifying the research on SPFs with respect to the proposed RQs which can help researchers to obtain an overview of the field. © 2016 IEEE.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH
OpenAIRE Logo
OpenDOAR Logo
Jisc Open Policy Finder Logo
Harman Logo
Base Logo
OAI Logo
Handle System Logo
ROAR Logo
ROARMAP Logo
Google Scholar Logo

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback