Which Technique Is Preferable for Grade 2-3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: Laser Vs. Rubber Band Ligation ? A Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.author Emral, Ahmet Cihangir
dc.contributor.author Gulen, Merter
dc.contributor.author Ege, Bahadir
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-05T20:47:11Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-05T20:47:11Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Background The aim of this study is to compare the short and long-term results (postoperative pain, complications, return to daily life, recurrence) between patients who underwent laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) and rubber band ligation (RBL) due to grade 2-3 hemorrhoidal disease. Methods The results of patients who underwent LH and RBL between June 2020 and June 2023 for grade 2-3 hemorrhoidal disease were evaluated retrospectively. The patient information was examined in terms of operation time, postoperative 1st, 7th and 14th day visual analog scale (VAS) values, the amount of analgesic used in the first 7 postoperative days, return to normal life (days), recurrence within 1 year and other complications (postoperative bleeding, thrombosis, urinary retention, infection/abscess, anal stenosis, deterioration in continence). Results A total of 260 patients were included in the study, 166 of whom underwent RBL and 94 LH. Operation time, VAS values, postoperative 7-day analgesic use (mg), worsening of incontinence, time to return to normal life (days), complications and recurrence within 1 year evaluated. LH has statistically significant lower postoperative 1st day pain and less analgesic use (mg) than RBL (p < 0.001). Conclus & imath;ons LH and RBL both offer effective treatment options for grade 2-3 hemorrhoidal disease, with comparable recurrence rates and time to return to normal life. However, LH is associated with significantly less postoperative pain and analgesic use on the first postoperative day, potentially enhancing patient satisfaction. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Atılım University en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The authors would like to thank all the hospital staff who contributed to the publication of this article. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s44411-025-00022-x
dc.identifier.issn 0006-9248
dc.identifier.issn 1336-0345
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85217771459
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-025-00022-x
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10490
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springernature en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Bratislava Medical Journal
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Hemorrhoids en_US
dc.subject Laser en_US
dc.subject Rubber Band Ligation en_US
dc.subject Pain en_US
dc.title Which Technique Is Preferable for Grade 2-3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: Laser Vs. Rubber Band Ligation ? A Retrospective Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.wosid Emral, Ahmet/A-5253-2019
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Emral, Ahmet Cihangir; Gulen, Merter; Ege, Bahadir] Atılım Univ, Affiliated Medicana Int Ankara Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 96 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 91 en_US
gdc.description.volume 126 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4406935734
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001464884400006
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.04
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.virtual.author Emral, Ahmet Cihangir
gdc.virtual.author Gülen, Merter
gdc.virtual.author Ege, Bahadır
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4114f7a0-7a32-4c63-9a07-da9ef012d74d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c9807427-f1c4-4918-bd6f-495806ca9a77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 82f5672d-e60a-4399-be58-bdad68af9068
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4114f7a0-7a32-4c63-9a07-da9ef012d74d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a496aaf0-0817-4258-97e0-1fbdc4cc0841
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 1877bd4a-6ea6-43cb-b8ee-28653b95e888
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 21b50621-50a1-4421-a981-c17e317aa040
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a496aaf0-0817-4258-97e0-1fbdc4cc0841

Files

Collections