Comparison of the deep drawability of aluminum and steel using numerical simulation experiments

dc.authorscopusid14831989200
dc.authorscopusid7003877035
dc.authorscopusid35567617800
dc.contributor.authorTekkaya, Ahmet Eeman
dc.contributor.authorTekkaya,A.E.
dc.contributor.authorGür,C.H.
dc.contributor.otherManufacturing Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:42:04Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempSönmez C., Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey; Tekkaya A.E., Department of Manufacturing Engineering, ATILIM University, Ankara, Turkey; Gür C.H., Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionAmerican Iron and Steel Institute; Daimler Chrysler Corporation; Ford Motor Corporation; General Motors Corporationen_US
dc.description.abstractSheet metal forming processes, especially deep drawing processes give diverse results by various materials. Extreme differences occur between steel sheets and aluminum sheets. The main causes of these differences are variances in micro- and macroscopic material properties, such as anisotropy. In this study, the behavior of two distinct materials, steel and aluminum alloy, during an axisymmetrical cup drawing operation has been studied numerically. For this purpose, finite element (FE) simulations of a simple cup drawing process, which was studied in the benchmarks of the NUMISHEET 2002 have been conducted using a commercial dynamic-explicit FE-analysis package. The materials analyzed have been 6111-T4 aluminum alloy and mild steel graded as deep drawing quality. Basic process parameters, which are the blank holding force and the lubrication condition, have been varied to obtain a "successful" product and the process windows for these two materials have been compared and investigated. Thickness distributions in the blank, force requirements for the process and product quality have been used for the basis of comparison. The results are also compared with an analytical model developed by Ramaekers. © 2005 American Institute of Physics.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.2011204
dc.identifier.endpage124en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0735402655
dc.identifier.isbn978-073540265-2
dc.identifier.issn0094-243X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33749563136
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.2011204
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/3536
dc.identifier.volume778 Aen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Physics Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAIP Conference Proceedings -- NUMISHEET 2005: 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes -- 15 August 2005 through 19 August 2005 -- Detroit, MIen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword Available]en_US
dc.titleComparison of the deep drawability of aluminum and steel using numerical simulation experimentsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418

Files

Collections