Validation of the Outcomes Tools for Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Outcomes Classification System and Their Sensitivities on Nursing Interventions

dc.contributor.author Gençbaş, Dercan
dc.contributor.author Bebiş, Hatice
dc.contributor.author Moorhead, Sue
dc.contributor.other Nursing
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-10T21:37:55Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-10T21:37:55Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp ATILIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ,YAKIN DOĞU ÜNİVERSİTESİ,Yabancı Kurumlar en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: There are many scales to measure urinary incontinence (UI). Nursing OutcomesClassification (NOC) scales which include Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Self-CareToileting, Medication Response, and Tissue integrity: Skin and Mucous Membranes are ideal foruse in the nursing process for comprehensive and holistic assessment, with surveys available.For this reason, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of these NOC outcomes andindicators used for UI.Methods: This research is a methodological study. Scope validations were applied andcalculated according to Fehring 1987 work model. Total of 55 experts which were the sample ofthe study rated Fehring as a “senior degree” with a score of 90 according to the experts’ scoring.These weighted scores obtained for NOC indicators were classified as critical, supplemental orexcluded.Results: In the NOC system, 5 NOCs proposed for nursing diagnosis of UI were proposed. Theseoutcomes are; Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Tissue Integrity, Self Care-Toileting, andMedication Response. After the scales were translated into Turkish, the weighted average of thescores was obtained from specialists for the coverage of all 5 NOCs. After getting the experts’opinion, 79 of the 82 indicators were calculated as critical, 3 of the indicators were calculated assupplemental. All NOCs were identified as valid and usable scales in Turkey.Conclusion: The five NOCs were verified for the evaluation of the output of individuals whoreceived nursing knowledge of UI and variant types. Recommendations include the testing ofNOC outcomes in clinical practice and inclusion in nursing curriculum. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2019.757
dc.identifier.endpage 27 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1302-0471
dc.identifier.issn 2146-8052
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 21 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 330828
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2019.757
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/330828/validation-of-the-outcomes-tools-for-urinary-incontinence-in-nursing-outcomes-classification-system-and-their-sensitivities-on-nursing-interventions
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/7486
dc.identifier.volume 62 en_US
dc.institutionauthor Gençbaş, Dercan
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Gülhane Tıp Dergisi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Genel ve Dahili Tıp en_US
dc.title Validation of the Outcomes Tools for Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Outcomes Classification System and Their Sensitivities on Nursing Interventions en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0b4467ea-8ab3-45db-a6b0-9783eccb63ec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0b4467ea-8ab3-45db-a6b0-9783eccb63ec
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e886e794-386d-4406-82ee-8eecb54d2873
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e886e794-386d-4406-82ee-8eecb54d2873

Files

Collections