Comparative Analysis of Three Innovative Housing Models in Copenhagen for Social Mix

dc.authorscopusid57210163891
dc.contributor.authorBıcan,N.B.
dc.contributor.authorBican, Nezih Burak
dc.contributor.otherArchitecture
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:45:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:45:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempBıcan N.B., Department of Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture, Atılım University, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractCopenhagen has been attracting residents both from abroad and other regions of Denmark, embracing a comprehensive development plan following an economic boom since the 1990s. Local decision-makers have been striving to transform the housing stock of the city in line with the evolving demographics of the city and consequent new demands of the urban society. At the same time, people are seeking cheaper and flexible alternatives of living; thus, social housing (almen bolig) emerges as an affordable option with reasonable qualities for Copenhagen residents. This study uses a comparative analysis to evaluate spatial approaches of three innovative social housing models developed by partnerships of some non-profit housing associations with Copenhagen municipality in 2015. Each model has a distinct motto; Generationernes Byhus (GBYH) builds up neighbourhood across generations; Boliger for Alle (BOFA) provides opportunity of transition across ownership types; and Almene Storbyboliger (ASBB) creates flexible/plastic system addressing demographical structure under change. Methodologically, the research is based on interviews with key stakeholders and in-depth analysis of visual and written documents. It provides a comparative analysis of the models, concentrating particularly on dwelling design approaches which address social mix and diversity. The paper concludes that although the social housing market is strictly controlled for socio-economic reasons, it still has the potential to support the evolution of the urban demography of Danish society thanks to embracement of innovative perspectives both by governmental authorities and forerunning housing associations. © 2020, Istanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architecture. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDanish Building Research Institute; Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, SBI; Aalborg Universitet, AAUen_US
dc.identifier.citation3
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/itujfa.2019.04875
dc.identifier.endpage53en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-7474
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083802195
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2019.04875
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/3975
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofA/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiversityen_US
dc.subjectDwelling designen_US
dc.subjectHouseholdsen_US
dc.subjectSocial housingen_US
dc.subjectSocial mixen_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Three Innovative Housing Models in Copenhagen for Social Mixen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6958bfbb-2e7a-4433-8573-768048668e8f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6958bfbb-2e7a-4433-8573-768048668e8f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf9fa2b5c-d081-4ee8-828c-ecfaa869079e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf9fa2b5c-d081-4ee8-828c-ecfaa869079e

Files

Collections