W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation
| dc.contributor.author | Sezgin, Deniz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yardim, Funda Ergun | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydin, Elif | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kara, Ali | |
| dc.contributor.other | Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.other | Airframe and Powerplant Maintenance | |
| dc.contributor.other | 15. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences | |
| dc.contributor.other | 13. School of Civil Aviation (4-Year) | |
| dc.contributor.other | 01. Atılım University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T17:48:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-06T17:48:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper compares the accuracy of Shooting and Bouncing Rays and Electric Field Integral Equation methods for Radar Cross Section prediction of small objects at 77-81 GHz band. Existing studies on RCS prediction methods often lack comprehensive comparisons between computational and experimental results, particularly for small objects measured with a 77 GHz radar. This study addresses this gap by presenting an in-depth analysis of both simulation and measurement data. In this work, three targets with varying geometries and materials were measured with a frequency modulated continuous wave radar and simulated using Ansys HFSS and CST Studio Suite. The measurements were performed with a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) frequency modulated continuous wave radar operating at 77-81 GHz. This study aims to emphasize the importance of considering both efficiency and accuracy when opting for an RCS prediction method. Overall, the outcomes of both methods have largely demonstrated good alignment. It has been noted that, while Shooting and Bouncing Rays method offers promising time-saving advantages, Electric Field Integral Equation method remains a valuable tool for complex geometries where precise results are crucial. | en_US | 
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.35378/gujs.1488832 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2147-1762 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1488832 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10839 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US | 
| dc.publisher | Gazi Univ | en_US | 
| dc.relation.ispartof | Gazi University Journal of Science | en_US | 
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US | 
| dc.subject | FMCW Radar | en_US | 
| dc.subject | SBR | en_US | 
| dc.subject | EFIE | en_US | 
| dc.subject | W-Band | en_US | 
| dc.subject | RCS | en_US | 
| dc.title | W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation | en_US | 
| dc.type | Article | en_US | 
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Kara, Ali | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Sezgin, Deniz | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Aydın, Elif | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C5 | |
| gdc.description.department | Atılım University | en_US | 
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Sezgin, Deniz] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye; [Yardim, Funda E. R. G. U. N.; Kara, Ali] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkiye; [Aydin, Elif] Cankaya Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06815 Ankara, Turkiye | en_US | 
| gdc.description.endpage | 1 | |
| gdc.description.issue | 3 | en_US | 
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US | 
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q3 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 1 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 38 | en_US | 
| gdc.description.woscitationindex | Emerging Sources Citation Index | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | N/A | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4411771972 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:001577790900002 | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 0.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.5942106E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 2.0809511E-10 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 0.0 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.0 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 0 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 0 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 0 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | be728837-c599-49c1-8e8d-81b90219bb15 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 679a1e66-b8e1-4b93-b006-a22d787776ed | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 1d7a7c27-e329-4a72-b120-fae3e2d529b6 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | be728837-c599-49c1-8e8d-81b90219bb15 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | c3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 0ad0b148-c2aa-44e7-8f0a-53ab5c8406d5 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | dff2e5a6-d02d-4bef-8b9e-efebe3919b10 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | e28bb977-cadc-4429-b547-973b099c3ce8 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b |