Investigation of Photosensitivity Side Effect of Systemic Doxycycline Used in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

dc.authorscopusid58626087700
dc.authorscopusid57241307900
dc.contributor.authorHasanbeyzade, S.
dc.contributor.authorSaadet, E.D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-05T20:47:04Z
dc.date.available2025-03-05T20:47:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempHasanbeyzade S., Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medicana International Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Saadet E.D., Department of Dermatology, Atilim University, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective In this study, photosensitivity and other side effects due to the usage of systemic doxycycline in summer during acne treatment and whether these side effects were related to the demographic and clinical properties of the patients were investigated. Methods Before conducting the study, approval of the ethics committee of the hospital was obtained. 251 patients who applied to the dermatology outpatient clinic between 01.05.2021-30.09.2021 and were diagnosed with moderate-severe acne were included in the study. Demographic characteristic of the patients, clinical and treatment features, and development of photosensitivity or other side effects during or after the treatment were examined. Results Side effects were seen in 9 out of a total of 251 patients (3.6%). Among these patients, 5 patients (2%) had erythematous papules or plaque-like lesions on the face, and 4 patients (1.6%) had erythematous papules on the forearms. A statistically significant difference for age, sex, the severity of the disease, and treatment dose was not detected between groups classified according to the side effects (p values were respectively: 0.67, 0.058, 0.343, and 0.858). Statistically, a significant difference was found between these groups for the treatment period and usage of sun protection (p values were respectively: 0.011 and 0.003). Conclusion In patients who have erythematous papules and plaques on the face, these findings regressed with topical treatment. Therefore these findings were considered to be due to the usage of the topical acne agent. However, most patients having erythematous papules on their forearms were not using sunscreens and had personal and/or familial history of atopy. Because side effects did not require cessation of the systemic treatment and regressed with administered treatment; in the case of regular usage of sunscreen and utilization of benzoyl peroxide in combination, the photosensitivity side effect was thought to be minimal. © 2023 Pakistan Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1292en_US
dc.identifier.issn1560-9014
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174893016
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage1285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10474
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPakistan Association of Dermatologistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologistsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount0
dc.subjectAcne Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectAcne Vulgarisen_US
dc.subjectDoxycyclineen_US
dc.subjectPhotosensitivityen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of Photosensitivity Side Effect of Systemic Doxycycline Used in the Treatment of Acne Vulgarisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections