Unraveling the Major Determinants Behind Price Changes in Four Selected Representative Agricultural Products

dc.authoridKAYRAL, IHSAN ERDEM/0000-0002-8335-8619
dc.authorwosidKAYRAL, IHSAN ERDEM/U-2822-2018
dc.contributor.authorAktepe, Nisa Sansel Tandogan
dc.contributor.authorKayral, Ihsan Erdem
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:23:15Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Aktepe, Nisa Sansel Tandogan] Atilim Univ, Grad Sch Social Sci, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkiye; [Kayral, Ihsan Erdem] Ostim Tech Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Int Trade & Finance, TR-06374 Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionKAYRAL, IHSAN ERDEM/0000-0002-8335-8619en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to analyze the drivers behind price changes in agricultural products in T & uuml;rkiye from 2002 to 2021, considering the impacts of three crises of different causes which are the global food crisis, the Russia-T & uuml;rkiye aircraft crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The potential factors are categorized into four subgroups: governmental effects, agricultural inputs, macroeconomic indicators, and climatic conditions. The selected agricultural goods for price change measurement include wheat and maize representing subsistence goods, and olive oil and cotton as marketing goods. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model is applied to observe both the short- and long-term impacts of the variables on price developments. The results suggest that government effectiveness, regulatory quality, nitrogen use, water price, money supply, exchange rate, and GDP under the related categories are the most effective factors in price changes. Among the variables under the category of climatic conditions, significant values are obtained only in the analysis of the temperature impact on olive oil. The analysis also reveals the variable impact of crises on the prices of the chosen products, depending on the goods involved. The maize and wheat analyses yield particularly noteworthy results. In the long run, nitrogen use demonstrates a substantial positive impact, registering at 29% for wheat and 19.47% for maize, respectively. Conversely, GDP exhibits a significant negative impact, with 26.15% and 20.08%. Short-term observations reveal that a unit increase in the governmental effect leads to a reduction in inflation for these products by 17.01% and 21.42%. However, changes in regulatory quality result in an increase in inflation by 25.45% and 20.77% for these products, respectively.en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture14050782
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050782
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2292
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001232987500001
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectagricultural commodity priceen_US
dc.subjectglobal food crisisen_US
dc.subjectRussia-T & uumlen_US
dc.subjectrkiye aircraft crisisen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.subjectgovernmental effecten_US
dc.subjectagricultural inputsen_US
dc.subjectmacroeconomic indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectsustainable development goals (SDGs)en_US
dc.subjectARDL modelen_US
dc.titleUnraveling the Major Determinants Behind Price Changes in Four Selected Representative Agricultural Productsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount0
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections