Validation of the outcomes tools for urinary incontinence in nursing outcomes classification system and their sensitivities on nursing interventions

dc.authorscopusid57194417771
dc.authorscopusid6505781670
dc.authorscopusid7006229367
dc.contributor.authorGençbaş, Dercan
dc.contributor.authorBebiş,H.
dc.contributor.authorMoorhead,S.
dc.contributor.otherNursing
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:45:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:45:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempGençbaş D., Atilim University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey; Bebiş H., Near East University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Nicosia, Cyprus; Moorhead S., The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa, United Statesen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: There are many scales to measure urinary incontinence (UI). Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) scales which include Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Self-Care Toileting, Medication Response, and Tissue integrity: Skin and Mucous Membranes are ideal for use in the nursing process for comprehensive and holistic assessment, with surveys available. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of these NOC outcomes and indicators used for UI. Methods: This research is a methodological study. Scope validations were applied and calculated according to Fehring 1987 work model. Total of 55 experts which were the sample of the study rated Fehring as a "senior degree" with a score of 90 according to the experts' scoring. These weighted scores obtained for NOC indicators were classified as critical, supplemental or excluded. Results: In the NOC system, 5 NOCs proposed for nursing diagnosis of UI were proposed. These outcomes are; Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Tissue Integrity, Self Care-Toileting, and Medication Response. After the scales were translated into Turkish, the weighted average of the scores was obtained from specialists for the coverage of all 5 NOCs. After getting the experts' opinion, 79 of the 82 indicators were calculated as critical, 3 of the indicators were calculated as supplemental. All NOCs were identified as valid and usable scales in Turkey. Conclusion: The five NOCs were verified for the evaluation of the output of individuals who received nursing knowledge of UI and variant types. Recommendations include the testing of NOC outcomes in clinical practice and inclusion in nursing curriculum. © 2020 by the University of Health Sciences Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/GULHANE.GALENOS.2019.757
dc.identifier.endpage27en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-0471
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084118435
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage21en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/GULHANE.GALENOS.2019.757
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/3984
dc.identifier.volume62en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGulhane Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectContent validityen_US
dc.subjectNursing diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectNursing outcomesen_US
dc.subjectUrinary incontinenceen_US
dc.titleValidation of the outcomes tools for urinary incontinence in nursing outcomes classification system and their sensitivities on nursing interventionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0b4467ea-8ab3-45db-a6b0-9783eccb63ec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0b4467ea-8ab3-45db-a6b0-9783eccb63ec
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione886e794-386d-4406-82ee-8eecb54d2873
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye886e794-386d-4406-82ee-8eecb54d2873

Files

Collections