Akbal, Gülserim ÖzcanKantur, ZeynepOzcan, GulserimEconomics2024-07-052024-07-05202400217-59081793-683710.1142/S0217590822410016https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590822410016https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1648Özcan, Gülserim/0000-0002-8207-8930The last decades proved that policymaking without considering uncertainty is impracticable. In an environment of uncertainty, policymakers have doubts about the policy models they routinely use. This paper focuses specifically on the situation where uncertainty on the financial side of the economy leads to misspecification in the policy model. We describe a coherent strategy for policymakers who are averse to model misspecification and analyze optimal policy design in the face of Knightian uncertainty. To do so, we augment a financial dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with model misspecification in a simple minimax framework where the central bank plays a zero-sum game versus a hypothetical evil agent. The policy is tailored to insure against the worst-case outcomes. We show that model ambiguity on the financial side requires a passive monetary policy stance. However, if the uncertainty originates from the supply side of the economy, an aggressive response of interest rate is required. We also show the impact of an additional macroprudential tool on the dynamics of the economy.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessModel uncertaintyfinancial stabilityoptimal monetary policyrobust controlKnightian uncertaintyArticleQ3692793812WOS:000736666700001