Sozen, Hulusi CenkKirkbesoglu, ErdemTuzlukaya, SuleCakar, Mehmet2025-05-052025-05-0520251751-67571751-676510.1504/EJIM.2025.1454092-s2.0-105001985693https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2025.145409https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10546This study aims at examining the role of European Management Review (EMR) within the on-going paradigmatic debates between Europe and North America concerning management and organisational research. Ten years worth of bibliometric data of the journal was gathered. Citation patterns of EMR authors were analysed according to which journals they preferred to refer to more frequently. Citation patterns of authors from sub-regions of Europe were also compared to test whether heterogeneity exists in terms of academic resource usage. The findings highlight that EMR has successfully constructed a bridge between research traditions of two continents. Qualitative, macro and theoretical articles, which are significant characteristics of the European paradigm, have a considerable rate of acceptance in EMR. Besides obeying local rules of scientific inquiry, the majority of European authors have decided to use influential North American journals. EMR has partially found a way to unify the fragmented research efforts in different parts of Europe.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessBibliometricSocial Network AnalysisManagement StudiesArticleQ4Q3261WOS:001457350400004