Garousi, VahidAmannejad, YasamanGarousi, VahidIrving, RobSahaf, ZahraSoftware Engineering2024-07-052024-07-0520141497807695519442159-484810.1109/ICSTW.2014.342-s2.0-84903640661https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2014.34https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/86Garousi, Vahid/0000-0001-6590-7576Test automation is a widely-used approach to reduce the cost of manual software testing. However, if it is not planned or conducted properly, automated testing would not necessarily be more cost effective than manual testing. Deciding what parts of a given System Under Test (SUT) should be tested in an automated fashion and what parts should remain manual is a frequently-asked and challenging question for practitioner testers. In this study, we propose a search-based approach for deciding what parts of a given SUT should be tested automatically to gain the highest Return On Investment (ROI). This work is the first systematic approach for this problem, and significance of our approach is that it considers automation in the entire testing process (i.e., from test-case design, to test scripting, to test execution, and test result evaluation). The proposed approach has been applied in an industrial setting in the context of a software product used in the oil and gas industry in Canada. Among the results of the case study is that, when planned and conducted properly using our decision-support approach, test automation provides the highest ROI. In this study, we show that if automation decision is taken effectively, test-case design, test execution, and test evaluation can result in about 307%, 675%, and 41% ROI in 10 rounds of using automated test suites.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessaction researchcost-benefit analysisindustrial case studysearch-based software engineeringsoftware test automationConference Object302311WOS:000356142700047