Once there was and once there wasn't: the tale of intellectuals and the state in Turkey

dc.authoridGencoglu, Funda/0000-0001-8211-8624
dc.authorscopusid55535975500
dc.contributor.authorGencoglu, Funda
dc.contributor.otherPolitical Science and Public Administration
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:22:20Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:22:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Gencoglu, Funda] Atilim Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionGencoglu, Funda/0000-0001-8211-8624en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a taxonomy of various conceptions of the intellectual and then analyses the changing official discourse on intellectuals in Turkey with reference to this taxonomy. The taxonomy developed here is an original contribution to the existing literature on intellectuals. It distinguishes six conceptions of the intellectual: (i) as the gadfly and the gift of god, (ii) as the philosopher, (iii) as parrhesiastes, (iv) as the activist, (v) as the exile and (vi) as the persona non grata. During the single-party years, the dominant approach oscillated between the intellectual as gadfly, God's gift and philosopher; during the 1960s and 1970s, it was replaced by a conception of the intellectual as the activist; during the aftermath of the 1980 coup d'etat, the intellectual was the exile. During the 1990s and 2000s, the intellectuals were mainly the critics of the hegemonic Kemalism, thus they were the epitomisation of parrhesia. This study argues that variations within the official discourse on intellectuals give important clues about how a hegemonic configuration is installed/challenged/displaced/replaced/re-installed, and since the current hegemony in Turkey stands on anti-intellectualism, the intellectual is now persona non grata.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01436597.2023.2219607
dc.identifier.endpage2114en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-6597
dc.identifier.issn1360-2241
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162716119
dc.identifier.startpage2098en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2219607
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2183
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001011920100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.institutionauthorGençoğlu, Funda
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntellectualsen_US
dc.subjectanti-intellectualismen_US
dc.subjecthegemonyen_US
dc.subjectparrhesiaen_US
dc.subjectpopulismen_US
dc.titleOnce there was and once there wasn't: the tale of intellectuals and the state in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8f0e7965-4d88-4460-ac18-769273019a0a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8f0e7965-4d88-4460-ac18-769273019a0a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationecf75fa8-1c9b-4972-ab84-c80943e88e5a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryecf75fa8-1c9b-4972-ab84-c80943e88e5a

Files

Collections