Parenting Stress in Turkish Mothers of Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Objective: To explore parenting stress and factors affecting the mothers of infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) in Turkey. Design and Participants: The study compared mothers of infants born with CL/P (n = 90) with mothers of healthy infants (n = 90). Mothers completed the data collection form, the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Results: Mothers of infants born with CL/P had higher mean parenting stress scores than the control mothers. A significant negative relationship was found between social support and parenting stress for mothers of infants born with CL/P but was not related for control mothers. Among mothers with an infant with CL/P, the mean parenting stress scores were higher for mothers preoperatively than mothers responding postoperatively. Among mothers with an infant with a cleft, higher stress was found for diagnosis after birth, not breastfeeding, feeding difficulties, lack of fathers' support, perceived difficult infant temperament, blame, anger, and concern for the future. Conclusion: Parenting stress was higher and social support was lower for mothers of infants with a cleft. Treatment teams can design interventions aimed at factors related to stress, such as addressing feeding issues, teaching coping skills, and linking to social support.
Description
Çınar Özbay, Sevil/0000-0002-9281-1614
Keywords
cleft lip, cleft palate, infant, parenting stress, paediatric nursing, Male, Parenting, Turkey, Cleft lip, Cleft Lip, Infant, Mothers, Cleft Palate, Paediatric nursing, Parenting stress, Cleft palate, Humans, Female
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
27
Volume
57
Issue
6
Start Page
753
End Page
761
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 25
Scopus : 30
PubMed : 8
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 107
Google Scholar™


