COSMIC light vs COSMIC classic manual: Case studies in functional size measurement

dc.authorscopusid56422190200
dc.authorscopusid57521977500
dc.authorscopusid55949165100
dc.authorscopusid7004233119
dc.contributor.authorHacaloglu,T.
dc.contributor.authorUnlu,H.
dc.contributor.authorDemirors,O.
dc.contributor.authorAbran,A.
dc.contributor.otherInformation Systems Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T11:16:39Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T11:16:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempHacaloglu T., Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 06531, Turkey, Atilim University, Ankara, 06830, Turkey; Unlu H., Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, 35430, Turkey; Demirors O., Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, 35430, Turkey; Abran A., École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canadaen_US
dc.description.abstractFunctional size has been used in software engineering for more than 40 years. When measured early in the software development life cycle, it can serve as direct input for effort estimation. The COSMIC Functional Size Measurement (FSM) method developed by the Common Software Measurement Consortium (COSMIC) is the latest ISO-compliant functional sizing method. A streamlined manual titled ''Software Development Velocity with COSMIC Function Points'' summarizes the measurement process and shortens the learning time. The aim of this study is to compare the classic COSMIC FSM manual and this new “light” manual in terms of accuracy of the resulting FSM applied to case studies. The findings show that use of the light manual results in accurate measurement. In addition, there were no significant time differences between the two. With respect to the variations in COSMIC Function Points (CFP) values in the two case studies, they three causes were identified: the Object of Interest (OOI) concept and corresponding data groups, details regarding Functional Process Independence, and Error/Confirmation messages related to the scope of the information included in the manuals. Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi[SCOPUS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-54]
dc.identifier.issn1613-0073
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85098219881
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/9531
dc.identifier.volume2725en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.institutionauthorHacaloğlu, Tuna
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCEUR-WSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCEUR Workshop Proceedings -- Joint 30th International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 15th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, IWSM-Mensura 2020 -- 29 October 2020 through 30 October 2020 -- Mexico City -- 165806en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCOSMICen_US
dc.subjectFunction pointsen_US
dc.subjectISO 19761en_US
dc.subjectSizeen_US
dc.subjectSoftware measurementen_US
dc.titleCOSMIC light vs COSMIC classic manual: Case studies in functional size measurementen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3ed58a9-ec7a-4537-bd73-68342f5537fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd3ed58a9-ec7a-4537-bd73-68342f5537fe
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationcf0fb36c-0500-438e-b4cc-ad1d4ef25579
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycf0fb36c-0500-438e-b4cc-ad1d4ef25579

Files

Collections