Yılmaz, Gözde

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Yılmaz, Gözde
Yilmaz, Gozde
Y., Gözde
Gozde, Yilmaz
Y., Gozde
G.,Yilmaz
Yilmaz G.
Yılmaz,G.
Yilmaz,G.
Gözde, Yılmaz
G.,Yılmaz
Yilmaz,Gozde
Y.,Gözde
Y.,Gozde
Yllmaz G.
Gözde Yılmaz
G., Yilmaz
G., Yılmaz
Job Title
Profesör Doktor
Email Address
gozde.yilmaz@atilim.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
International Relations
Status
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Scholarly Output

58

Articles

21

Citation Count

204

Supervised Theses

20

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 19
  • Book
    Citation - Scopus: 6
    Minority Rights in Turkey: a Battlefield for Europeanization
    (Taylor and Francis, 2017) Yilmaz,G.; International Relations
    The issue of minority rights is highly contested in both member and candidate states of the European Union. Compared with other policy areas, the Europeanization process in minority rights is much slower and more problematic. Turkey, though, differs from the majority of the member states by showing positive development, although admittedly it is still characterised by both accelerations and slowdowns. This book examines how minority protection, as a highly sensitive and controversial issue, is promoted or constrained in the EU’s neighbourhood, by focusing on the case of Turkey. It draws on current external Europeanization theories and suggests a rationalist model comprising both the role of the EU and also domestic factors. It integrates two models of external Europeanization provided by Schimmelfennig and Sedelmier (2005), i.e. the external incentives and lesson-drawing models, and the framework of the pull-and-push model of member state Europeanization by Börzel (2000), to derive a comprehensive model for external Europeanization. The book argues that the push by EU conditionality and the pull by domestic dissatisfaction are influential in promoting change. Without one or the other, domestic change remains incomplete, as it is either shallow or selective. Focusing on the Turkish case, the book enhances the theoretical understanding of external Europeanization by shifting focus away from EU conditionality to voluntarily driven change, and by providing a theoretical model that is applicable to other countries. It will therefore be a valuable resource for students and scholars studying minority rights and Turkish and European ethnic politics. © 2017 Gözde Yilmaz.
  • Book Part
    Citation - WoS: 0
    Pull Without Push in 2008-2014 Drift From the Eu and Rule by the 'domestic
    (Routledge, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    [No Abstract Available]
  • Book Part
    Citation - WoS: 0
    Changing Minority Rights of Turkey in 1999-2014
    (Routledge, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    [No Abstract Available]
  • Book Part
    Citation - Scopus: 0
    Conclusion
    (Springer International Publishing, 2022) Yilmaz,G.; International Relations
    This book explores non-discrimination in Turkey by dividing the principle into issue areas. It provides a detailed analysis of many areas within the principle of non-discrimination. © The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Talk the Talk, or Walk the Walk? Changing Narratives in Europeanization Research
    (Walter de Gruyter Gmbh, 2017) Agarin, Timofey; Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    Over the past two decades, there has been a growing interest in Europeanization, both within and beyond the European Union (EU). The impact of Eastern enlargement in 2004 on candidate and neighbourhood countries has attracted scholarly attention, and a consensus currently exists on the success of the EU's transformative power through the employment of a conditionality mechanism. However, the limits of EU conditionality upon candidate countries and neighbourhood Europeanization, in addition to the problems experienced by the EU itself, have brought into question whether the end of Europeanization research is in sight. Considering this, we critically evaluate the issues discussed in the scholarship on Europeanization and review several points of interest in relation to EU candidate countries in the Western Balkans as well as Turkey.
  • Book Part
    Citation - Scopus: 9
    Same Same or Different?: Accession Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe and Turkey Compared
    (Taylor and Francis Inc., 2015) Börzel,T.A.; Soyaltin,D.; Yilmaz,G.; International Relations
    [No abstract available]
  • Editorial
    Citation - WoS: 0
    Exploring the puzzle of minority rights Introduction
    (Routledge, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    [No Abstract Available]
  • Book Part
    Citation - WoS: 0
    Transformative Power of the European Union, Minority Rights and Turkey
    (Routledge, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    [No Abstract Available]
  • Book Part
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Theorizing Europeanization Through Enlargement Pull-And Model
    (Routledge, 2017) Yilmaz, Gozde; International Relations
    [No Abstract Available]
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 30
    Citation - Scopus: 38
    Zooming Into the 'domestic in Europeanization: Promotion of Fight Against Corruption and Minority Rights in Turkey
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2014) Yilmaz, Gozde; Soyaltin, Digdem; International Relations
    Since the credibility of the European Union (EU) conditionality for Turkey has significantly weakened after 2005, compliance with the EU requirements has become less likely. However, we observe continuing reforms in the fight against corruption and minority rights, which is rather puzzling. Given the limited impact of the EU incentives, this paper brings back the 'domestic' into the analysis by exploring the role of various domestic actors, such as Turkish state elites, civil society and the media. Yet, as the empirical evidence suggests, policy change in the fight against corruption and minority rights has been driven by the domestic agenda of the governing party, the Justice and Development Party, and its political preferences based on strategic calculations.