Browsing by Author "Moorhead, Sue"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Citation Count: 3
Noc/Nic Linkages To Nanda-I for Continence Care of Elderly People With Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Homes: a Systematic Review
(Istanbul Univ-cerrahapasa, 2019) Bebis, Hatice; Gençbaş, Dercan; Moorhead, Sue; Gencbas, Dercan; Ozdemir, Serpil; Seven, Memnun; Nursing
Aim: The aim of this study was to review interventional studies conducted by nurses about elderly people with urinary incontinence in nursing homes and to match the results to standardized nursing terminology using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification Linkages to the NANDA-I diagnoses guidelines. Method: A systematic review of quantitative intervention studies was conducted using the PRISMA statement as a guide. The interventional research in English was scanned using the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases from January 2005 to May 2015. Fourteen studies that had at least one nurse researcher were conducted in nursing homes, excluding surgical and pharmacological interventions. The Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions Part II-U List were used as a guide to select North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification Scales, and Nursing Interventions from the data. Results: We found the frequency of use of various NANDA-I diagnoses, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing Outcomes based on the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions List for incontinence. Conclusion: Using the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses guide may provide new nursing perspectives on non-standardized research. In future studies, this may allow a comparison of data worldwide, enabling nurses to use the results in evidence-based practices.
Citation Count: 0
Validation of the Outcomes Tools for Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Outcomes Classification System and Their Sensitivities on Nursing Interventions
(2020) Gençbaş, Dercan; Gençbaş, Dercan; Bebiş, Hatice; Moorhead, Sue; Nursing
Aim: There are many scales to measure urinary incontinence (UI). Nursing OutcomesClassification (NOC) scales which include Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Self-CareToileting, Medication Response, and Tissue integrity: Skin and Mucous Membranes are ideal foruse in the nursing process for comprehensive and holistic assessment, with surveys available.For this reason, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of these NOC outcomes andindicators used for UI.Methods: This research is a methodological study. Scope validations were applied andcalculated according to Fehring 1987 work model. Total of 55 experts which were the sample ofthe study rated Fehring as a “senior degree” with a score of 90 according to the experts’ scoring.These weighted scores obtained for NOC indicators were classified as critical, supplemental orexcluded.Results: In the NOC system, 5 NOCs proposed for nursing diagnosis of UI were proposed. Theseoutcomes are; Urinary Continence, Urinary Elimination, Tissue Integrity, Self Care-Toileting, andMedication Response. After the scales were translated into Turkish, the weighted average of thescores was obtained from specialists for the coverage of all 5 NOCs. After getting the experts’opinion, 79 of the 82 indicators were calculated as critical, 3 of the indicators were calculated assupplemental. All NOCs were identified as valid and usable scales in Turkey.Conclusion: The five NOCs were verified for the evaluation of the output of individuals whoreceived nursing knowledge of UI and variant types. Recommendations include the testing ofNOC outcomes in clinical practice and inclusion in nursing curriculum.